Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26024882›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2016

A comparison of hierarchical cluster analysis and league table rankings as methods for analysis and presentation of district health system performance data in Uganda.

Christine K Tashobya, Dominique Dubourg, Freddie Ssengooba, Niko Speybroeck, Jean Macq, Bart Criel

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. QALY league table of Iran: a practical method for better resource allocation.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Post-operative opioid pain management patterns for patients who receive hip surgery.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2017
    Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christine K TashobyaQuality Assurance Department, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda, Public Health Department, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium, School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda and tashobyack@yahoo.co.uk.
Dominique DubourgPublic Health Department, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Freddie SsengoobaSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda and.
Niko SpeybroeckInstitute of Health and Society, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Jean MacqInstitute of Health and Society, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Bart CrielPublic Health Department, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2003, the Uganda Ministry of Health introduced the district league table for district health system performance assessment. The league table presents district performance against a number of input, process and output indicators and a composite index to rank districts. This study explores the use of hierarchical cluster analysis for analysing and presenting district health systems performance data and compares this approach with the use of the league table in Uganda. Ministry of Health and district plans and reports, and published documents were used to provide information on the development and utilization of the Uganda district league table. Quantitative data were accessed from the Ministry of Health databases. Statistical analysis using SPSS version 20 and hierarchical cluster analysis, utilizing Wards' method was used. The hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted on the basis of seven clusters determined for each year from 2003 to 2010, ranging from a cluster of good through moderate-to-poor performers. The characteristics and membership of clusters varied from year to year and were determined by the identity and magnitude of performance of the individual variables. Criticisms of the league table include: perceived unfairness, as it did not take into consideration district peculiarities; and being oversummarized and not adequately informative. Clustering organizes the many data points into clusters of similar entities according to an agreed set of indicators and can provide the beginning point for identifying factors behind the observed performance of districts. Although league table ranking emphasize summation and external control, clustering has the potential to encourage a formative, learning approach. More research is required to shed more light on factors behind observed performance of the different clusters. Other countries especially low-income countries that share many similarities with Uganda can learn from these experiences.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareModels, StatisticalCluster AnalysisDecision MakingGovernment ProgramsHumansUgandaDecentralizationdecision makinglocal governmentlow incomestatistical analysis

Identifiers

PMID26024882
PMCPMC4748130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.