ArticleBiomedical engineering online2015
Quantification of three-dimensional computed tomography angiography for evaluating coronary luminal stenosis using digital subtraction angiography as the standard of reference.
Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) versus other cancer screenings in early diagnosis of lung cancer: A meta-analysis.Medicine · 2018Pooled it
- An exploratory analysis of the utility of maximum degree of stenosis on computed tomography coronary angiography for predicting major adverse cardiac events.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Case Report: Quantitative multimodal imaging for surgical planning in isolated pulmonary artery sling.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Effects of combining multiple dose reduction techniques on coronary computed tomography angiography.World journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Retinal and choroidal vascular changes in coronary heart disease: an optical coherence tomography angiography study.Biomedical optics express · 2019Article
- A new CFD based non-invasive method for functional diagnosis of coronary stenosis.Biomedical engineering online · 2018Article
- Dynamic Monitoring of Erythrocyte Distribution Width (RDW) and Platelet Distribution Width (PDW) in Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe sought to evaluate the accuracy of quantitative three-dimensional (3D) CT angiography (CTA) for the assessment of coronary luminal stenosis using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the standard of reference.
methodTwenty-three patients with 54 lesions were referred for CTA followed by DSA. The CTA scans were performed with 256-slice spiral CT. 3D CTA were reconstructed from two-dimensional CTA imaging sequences in order to extract the following quantitative indices: minimal lumen diameter, percent diameter stenosis (%DS), minimal lumen area, and percent area stenosis (%AS). Correlation and limits of agreement were calculated using Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis, respectively. The diagnostic performance and the diagnostic concordance of 3D CTA-derived anatomic parameters (%DS, %AS) for the detection of severe coronary arterial stenosis (as assessed by DSA) were presented as sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, and Kappa statistics. Of which vessels with %DS >50% or with %AS >75% were identified as severe coronary arterial lesions.
resultThe correlations of the anatomic parameters between 3D CTA and DSA were significant (r = 0.51-0.74, P < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis confirmed that the mean differences were small (from -1.11 to 27.39%), whereas the limits of agreement were relatively wide (from ±28.07 to ±138.64%). Otherwise, the diagnostic accuracy (74.1% with 58.3% sensitivity and 86.7% specificity for DS%; 74.1% with 45.8% sensitivity and 96.7% specificity for %AS) and the diagnostic concordance (k = 0.46 for DS%; 0.45 for %AS) of 3D CTA-derived anatomic parameters for the detection of severe stenosis were moderate.
conclusion3D advanced imaging reconstruction technique is a helpful tool to promote the use of CTA as an alternative to assess luminal stenosis in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.