Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26024653›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2015

Re-resection for recurrent high-grade glioma in the setting of re-irradiation: more is not always better.

Joshua D Palmer, Joshua Siglin, Kosj Yamoah, Tu Dan, Colin E Champ, Voichita Bar-Ad, Maria Werner-Wasik, James J Evans, Lyndon Kim, Jon Glass and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. High-dose salvage re-irradiation for recurrent/progressive adult diffuse glioma: healing or hurting?Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Prognostic values of YTHDF1 regulated negatively by mir-3436 in Glioma.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua D PalmerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center and Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Bodine Center for Cancer Treatment, 111 South 11th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA. Joshua.palmer@jefferson.edu.
Joshua SiglinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, UPMC Cancer Center at UPMC St. Margaret, 200 Delafield Road, Pittsburgh, PA, 15215, USA.
Kosj YamoahDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center and Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Bodine Center for Cancer Treatment, 111 South 11th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Tu DanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center and Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Bodine Center for Cancer Treatment, 111 South 11th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Colin E ChampDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, UPMC Cancer Center at UPMC St. Margaret, 200 Delafield Road, Pittsburgh, PA, 15215, USA.
Voichita Bar-AdDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center and Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Bodine Center for Cancer Treatment, 111 South 11th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Maria Werner-WasikDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center and Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Bodine Center for Cancer Treatment, 111 South 11th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
James J EvansDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center and Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, 909 Walnut St #3, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Lyndon KimDepartment of Neurology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center and Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, 909 Walnut St #3, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Jon GlassDepartment of Neurology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center and Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, 909 Walnut St #3, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Christopher FarrellDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center and Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, 909 Walnut St #3, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
David W AndrewsDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center and Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, 909 Walnut St #3, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Wenyin ShiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center and Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Bodine Center for Cancer Treatment, 111 South 11th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center · USThomas Jefferson University · USSt. Margaret Memorial Hospital · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal treatment for patients with recurrent high grade glioma (HGG) remains controversial. Available therapies include surgery, re-irradiation, alternating electric fields or systemic therapy. Here we investigate whether re-resection will improve survival in patients receiving repeat radiotherapy for tumor recurrence. 231 consecutive patients with recurrent HGG treated with re-irradiation between 1994 and 2012 were analyzed. 105 patients underwent re-resection. Re-irradiation was delivered using daily fractions of 3.5 Gy to a median total dose of 35 Gy. Survival was then analyzed comparing patients with and without re-resection. Overall survival (OS) and survival from the first recurrence are reported. Univariate and cox-proportional hazard modeling was performed in a step-wise multivariate analysis using known prognostic factors. The median follow-up time from initial diagnosis was 25.7 months. The median OS from initial diagnosis of the entire group was 22.5 months. There was no significant difference in median overall survival between patients who received re-resection versus no re-resection, 23 versus 21.9 months respectively (p = 0.6). Additionally, there was no difference in median survival from the time of first recurrence 10.5 months without re-resection versus 11.1 months with re-resection (p = 0.09). After adjusting for known prognostic variables, only age remained significant. Re-irradiation is an effective salvage therapy for patients with localized, progressive high grade glioma, achieving a median survival of 10-11 months from re-irradiation. Our data reveals no significant improvement in survival with the addition of re-resection to re-irradiated patients with HGG.

Indexed as

Re-IrradiationReoperationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain NeoplasmsDatabases, FactualFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGliomaHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisFractionated stereotactic radiotherapyOverall survivalRecurrent high-grade gliomaRe-resection

Identifiers

PMID26024653
OpenAlexW2148620120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.