Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26024562›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2015

Valuing Quiet: An Economic Assessment of U.S. Environmental Noise as a Cardiovascular Health Hazard.

Tracy K Swinburn, Monica S Hammer, Richard L Neitzel

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Meta-analysis of job-exposure matrix data from multiple sources.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Different considerations in economic impacts of aircraft noise.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Community impacts of aviation noise: a pilot survey.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Shaping a 21Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Population health implications of exposure to pervasive military aircraft noise pollution.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Noise Exposure and Quality of Life Among Nurses.Workplace health & safety · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tracy K SwinburnRisk Science Center, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Monica S HammerRisk Science Center, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Richard L NeitzelRisk Science Center, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Environmental Health Sciences (Neitzel), School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: rneitzel@umich.edu.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

University of Michigan ERC-supplement (TRT)T42OH008455 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NEITZEL, RICHARD L · 2005 to 2025
$32.3M
NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEnvironmental noise pollution increases the risk for hearing loss, stress, sleep disruption, annoyance, and cardiovascular disease and has other adverse health impacts. Recent (2013) estimates suggest that more than 100 million Americans are exposed to unhealthy levels of noise. Given the pervasive nature and significant health effects of environmental noise pollution, the corresponding economic impacts may be substantial.

methodsThis 2014 economic assessment developed a new approach to estimate the impact of environmental noise on the prevalence and cost of key components of hypertension and cardiovascular disease in the U.S. By placing environmental noise in context with comparable environmental pollutants, this approach can inform public health law, planning, and policy. The effects of hypothetical national-scale changes in environmental noise levels on the prevalence and corresponding costs of hypertension and coronary heart disease were estimated, with the caveat that the national-level U.S. noise data our exposure estimates were derived from are >30 years old.

resultsThe analyses suggested that a 5-dB noise reduction scenario would reduce the prevalence of hypertension by 1.4% and coronary heart disease by 1.8%. The annual economic benefit was estimated at $3.9 billion.

conclusionsThese findings suggest significant economic impacts from environmental noise-related cardiovascular disease. Given these initial findings, noise may deserve increased priority and research as an environmental health hazard.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCoronary DiseaseEnvironmental ExposureHumansHypertensionNoisePrevalencePublic HealthRisk FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26024562
PMCPMC4819987
OpenAlexW364094308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.