Trial reportPloS one2015
Increasing live birth rate by preimplantation genetic screening of pooled polar bodies using array comparative genomic hybridization.
Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pregnancy and child developmental outcomes after preimplantation genetic screening: a meta-analytic and systematic review.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2018Pooled it
- Polar Body Biopsy Helps in Reducing the Total Pregnancy Loss Rates in Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles.Cureus · 2025Article
- Advanced strategies for single embryo selection in assisted human reproduction: A review of clinical practice and research methods.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2025Article
- Rapid and minimally invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) based on polar body and nanopore sequencing: a viable alternative to conventional trophectoderm-based PGT-A?Human reproduction open · 2025Article
- Aneuploidy detection in pooled polar bodies using rapid nanopore sequencing.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- Impact of maternally derived meiotic aneuploidies on early embryonic development in vitro.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Observational
- Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived In Vitro Gametogenesis and Synthetic Embryos-It Is Never Too Early for an Ethical Debate.Stem cells translational medicine · 2023Article
- Chromosome Inequality: Causes and Consequences of Non-Random Segregation Errors in Mitosis and Meiosis.Cells · 2022Review
- Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic test and technical tips: A review.Reproductive medicine and biology · 2020Review
- An Economic Analysis of Aneuploidy Screening of Oocytes in Assisted Reproduction in Germany.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2020Article
- Identification of mosaic and segmental aneuploidies by next-generation sequencing in preimplantation genetic screening can improve clinical outcomes compared to array-comparative genomic hybridization.Molecular cytogenetics · 2017Article
- Preimplantation genetic screening 2.0: the theory.Molecular human reproduction · 2016Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meiotic errors during oocyte maturation are considered the major contributors to embryonic aneuploidy and failures in human IVF treatment. Various technologies have been developed to screen polar bodies, blastomeres and trophectoderm cells for chromosomal aberrations. Array-CGH analysis using bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) arrays is widely applied for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) using single cells. Recently, an increase in the pregnancy rate has been demonstrated using array-CGH to evaluate trophectoderm cells. However, in some countries, the analysis of embryonic cells is restricted by law. Therefore, we used BAC array-CGH to assess the impact of polar body analysis on the live birth rate. A disadvantage of polar body aneuploidy screening is the necessity of the analysis of both the first and second polar bodies, resulting in increases in costs for the patient and complex data interpretation. Aneuploidy screening results may sometimes be ambiguous if the first and second polar bodies show reciprocal chromosomal aberrations. To overcome this disadvantage, we tested a strategy involving the pooling of DNA from both polar bodies before DNA amplification. We retrospectively studied 351 patients, of whom 111 underwent polar body array-CGH before embryo transfer. In the group receiving pooled polar body array-CGH (aCGH) analysis, 110 embryos were transferred, and 29 babies were born, corresponding to live birth rates of 26.4% per embryo and 35.7% per patient. In contrast, in the control group, the IVF treatment was performed without preimplantation genetic screening (PGS). For this group, 403 embryos were transferred, and 60 babies were born, resulting in live birth rates of 14.9% per embryo and 22.7% per patient. In conclusion, our data show that in the aCGH group, the use of aneuploidy screening resulted in a significantly higher live birth rate compared with the control group, supporting the benefit of PGS for IVF couples in addition to the suitability and effectiveness of our polar body pooling strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.