ReviewSeminars in respiratory and critical care medicine2015
Role of chest computed tomography in prevention of occupational respiratory disease: review of recent literature.
Review in Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exhaled breath profiling for early silicosis detection in workers at risk: a pilot study.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 as a potential biomarker for early diagnosis of silicosis: a case-control study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Non-Infectious Granulomatous Lung Disease: Imaging Findings with Pathologic Correlation.Korean journal of radiology · 2021Review
- Early Detection Methods for Silicosis in Australia and Internationally: A Review of the Literature.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Respiratory surveillance for coal mine dust and artificial stone exposed workers in Australia and New Zealand: A position statement from the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand.Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2020Review
- Perfecting detection through education.Radiography (London, England : 1995) · 2020Article
- Respiratory surveillance in mineral dust-exposed workers.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2020Article
- Ambient air pollution and daily hospital admissions for respiratory system-related diseases in a heavy polluted city in Northeast China.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020Article
- Accelerated Silicosis-An Emerging Epidemic Associated with Engineered Stone. Comment on Leso, V. et al. Artificial Stone Associated Silicosis: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Chest CT scan findings in World Trade Center workers.Archives of environmental & occupational health · 2019Article
- Asbestos-induced lung disease in small-scale clutch manufacturing workers.Indian journal of occupational and environmental medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This review provides an update on literature published over the past 5 years that is relevant to using chest computed tomography (CT) as a tool for preventing occupational respiratory disease. An important area of investigation has been in the use of low-dose CT (LDCT) to screen asbestos-exposed populations for lung cancer. Two recent systematic reviews have reached conclusions in support of screening. Based on the limited evidence that is currently available, the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health has recommended LDCT screening in asbestos-exposed individuals if their personal combination of risk factors yields a risk for lung cancer equal to that needed for entry into the National Lung Screening Trial. It has also recommended further research, such as to document the optimal frequency of screening and the effectiveness of screening. Recent literature continues to support high-resolution CT (HRCT) as being more sensitive than chest radiography in detecting pneumoconiosis. However, there are insufficient data to determine the effectiveness of HRCT screening in improving individual outcomes if used in screening for pneumoconiosis and its routine use for this purpose cannot be recommended. However, if HRCT is used to evaluate populations, recent literature shows that the International Classification of HRCT for Occupational and Environmental Respiratory Diseases provides an important tool for reproducible evaluation and recording of findings. HRCT is an important tool for individual patient management and recent literature has documented that chest HRCT findings are significantly associated with outcomes such as pulmonary function and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.