Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26024316›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Genome-Wide Characterization of RNA Editing in Chicken Embryos Reveals Common Features among Vertebrates.

Laure Frésard, Sophie Leroux, Pierre-François Roux, Christophe Klopp, Stéphane Fabre, Diane Esquerré, Patrice Dehais, Anis Djari, David Gourichon, Sandrine Lagarrigue and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genome-wide profiling of RNA editing sites in sheep.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Laure FrésardINRA, Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Castanet-Tolosan, France; Université de Toulouse, INP, ENSAT, Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Castanet-Tolosan, France; Université de Toulouse, INP, ENVT, Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Toulouse, France.
Sophie LerouxINRA, Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Castanet-Tolosan, France; Université de Toulouse, INP, ENSAT, Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Castanet-Tolosan, France; Université de Toulouse, INP, ENVT, Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Toulouse, France.
Pierre-François RouxAgrocampus Ouest, Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Élevage, Rennes, France; INRA, Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Élevage, Rennes, France.
Christophe KloppINRA, Sigenae Biométrie et Intelligence Artificielle, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Stéphane FabreINRA, Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Castanet-Tolosan, France; Université de Toulouse, INP, ENSAT, Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Castanet-Tolosan, France; Université de Toulouse, INP, ENVT, Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Toulouse, France.
Diane EsquerréINRA, Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Castanet-Tolosan, France; Université de Toulouse, INP, ENSAT, Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Castanet-Tolosan, France; Université de Toulouse, INP, ENVT, Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Toulouse, France; INRA, GeT-PlaGe Genotoul, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Patrice DehaisINRA, Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Castanet-Tolosan, France; Université de Toulouse, INP, ENSAT, Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Castanet-Tolosan, France; Université de Toulouse, INP, ENVT, Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Toulouse, France; INRA, Sigenae Biométrie et Intelligence Artificielle, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Anis DjariINRA, Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Castanet-Tolosan, France; Université de Toulouse, INP, ENSAT, Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Castanet-Tolosan, France; Université de Toulouse, INP, ENVT, Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Toulouse, France; INRA, Sigenae Biométrie et Intelligence Artificielle, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
David GourichonINRA, Pôle d'Expérimentation Avicole de Tours, Nouzilly, France.
Sandrine LagarrigueAgrocampus Ouest, Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Élevage, Rennes, France; INRA, Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Élevage, Rennes, France.
Frédérique PitelINRA, Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Castanet-Tolosan, France; Université de Toulouse, INP, ENSAT, Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Castanet-Tolosan, France; Université de Toulouse, INP, ENVT, Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Toulouse, France.
École Nationale Supérieure Agronomique de Toulouse · FRÉcole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse · FRInstitut Agro Rennes-Angers · FRUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FRBiologie des Oiseaux et Aviculture · FRGénétique Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage · FRInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique · MA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA editing results in a post-transcriptional nucleotide change in the RNA sequence that creates an alternative nucleotide not present in the DNA sequence. This leads to a diversification of transcription products with potential functional consequences. Two nucleotide substitutions are mainly described in animals, from adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) and from cytidine to uridine (C-to-U). This phenomenon is described in more details in mammals, notably since the availability of next generation sequencing technologies allowing whole genome screening of RNA-DNA differences. The number of studies recording RNA editing in other vertebrates like chicken is still limited. We chose to use high throughput sequencing technologies to search for RNA editing in chicken, and to extend the knowledge of its conservation among vertebrates. We performed sequencing of RNA and DNA from 8 embryos. Being aware of common pitfalls inherent to sequence analyses that lead to false positive discovery, we stringently filtered our datasets and found fewer than 40 reliable candidates. Conservation of particular sites of RNA editing was attested by the presence of 3 edited sites previously detected in mammals. We then characterized editing levels for selected candidates in several tissues and at different time points, from 4.5 days of embryonic development to adults, and observed a clear tissue-specificity and a gradual increase of editing level with time. By characterizing the RNA editing landscape in chicken, our results highlight the extent of evolutionary conservation of this phenomenon within vertebrates, attest to its tissue and stage specificity and provide support of the absence of non A-to-I events from the chicken transcriptome.

Indexed as

GenomeRNA EditingAnimalsChick EmbryoChickensComputational BiologyDNAEvolution, MolecularHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingRNASequence Analysis, DNASequence Analysis, RNADNARNA

Identifiers

PMID26024316
PMCPMC4449034
OpenAlexW1559580056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.