ArticlePloS one2015
Genome-Wide Characterization of RNA Editing in Chicken Embryos Reveals Common Features among Vertebrates.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deciphering APOBEC1 in Avians: unravelling loss events and functional insights.Immunogenetics · 2026Article
- Deep learning reveals determinants of transcriptional infidelity at nucleotide resolution in the allopolyploid line by goldfish and common carp hybrids.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Identification of RNA Editing Sites Reveals Functional Modifications with the Addition of Methionine to the Daily Rations of Yaks.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Global A-to-I RNA editing during myogenic differentiation of goat MuSCs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Unveiling the functional and evolutionary landscape of RNA editing in chicken using genomics and transcriptomics.Zoological research · 2022Article
- Characterization of RNA Editome in the Mammary Gland of Yaks during the Lactation and Dry Periods.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Genome-Wide Identification of RNA Editing Sites Affecting Muscle Development in Yak.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- RNA-Seq Data for Reliable SNP Detection and Genotype Calling: Interest for Coding Variant Characterization andFrontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Conservation of A-to-I RNA editing in bowhead whale and pig.PloS one · 2021Article
- Variant analysis pipeline for accurate detection of genomic variants from transcriptome sequencing data.PloS one · 2019Article
- Genome-wide profiling of RNA editing sites in sheep.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2019Article
- Transcription-Associated Mutation Promotes RNA Complexity in Highly Expressed Genes-A Major New Source of Selectable Variation.Molecular biology and evolution · 2018Article
- Genome-wide identification and analysis of A-to-I RNA editing events in bovine by transcriptome sequencing.PloS one · 2018Article
- RES-Scanner: a software package for genome-wide identification of RNA-editing sites.GigaScience · 2016Article
- The Extent of mRNA Editing Is Limited in Chicken Liver and Adipose, but Impacted by Tissular Context, Genotype, Age, and Feeding as Exemplified with a Conserved Edited Site in COG3.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RNA editing results in a post-transcriptional nucleotide change in the RNA sequence that creates an alternative nucleotide not present in the DNA sequence. This leads to a diversification of transcription products with potential functional consequences. Two nucleotide substitutions are mainly described in animals, from adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) and from cytidine to uridine (C-to-U). This phenomenon is described in more details in mammals, notably since the availability of next generation sequencing technologies allowing whole genome screening of RNA-DNA differences. The number of studies recording RNA editing in other vertebrates like chicken is still limited. We chose to use high throughput sequencing technologies to search for RNA editing in chicken, and to extend the knowledge of its conservation among vertebrates. We performed sequencing of RNA and DNA from 8 embryos. Being aware of common pitfalls inherent to sequence analyses that lead to false positive discovery, we stringently filtered our datasets and found fewer than 40 reliable candidates. Conservation of particular sites of RNA editing was attested by the presence of 3 edited sites previously detected in mammals. We then characterized editing levels for selected candidates in several tissues and at different time points, from 4.5 days of embryonic development to adults, and observed a clear tissue-specificity and a gradual increase of editing level with time. By characterizing the RNA editing landscape in chicken, our results highlight the extent of evolutionary conservation of this phenomenon within vertebrates, attest to its tissue and stage specificity and provide support of the absence of non A-to-I events from the chicken transcriptome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.