Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26024293›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2015

Glycemic responses, appetite ratings and gastrointestinal hormone responses of most common breads consumed in Spain. A randomized control trial in healthy humans.

Carolina Gonzalez-Anton, Maria C Rico, Estefania Sanchez-Rodriguez, Maria D Ruiz-Lopez, Angel Gil, Maria D Mesa

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carolina Gonzalez-AntonDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology II, Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology "Jose Mataix", University of Granada, Avenida del Conocimiento s/n, 18100 Armilla (Granada), Spain. karol29@correo.ugr.es.
Maria C RicoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology II, Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology "Jose Mataix", University of Granada, Avenida del Conocimiento s/n, 18100 Armilla (Granada), Spain. mdcrico@ugr.es.
Estefania Sanchez-RodriguezDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology II, Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology "Jose Mataix", University of Granada, Avenida del Conocimiento s/n, 18100 Armilla (Granada), Spain. estefaniasr@outlook.com.
Maria D Ruiz-LopezDepartment of Nutrition and Food Science, Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology "Jose Mataix", University of Granada, Campus Universitario de Cartuja C.P., 18071 Granada (Granada), Spain. mdruiz@ugr.es.
Angel GilDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology II, Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology "Jose Mataix", University of Granada, Avenida del Conocimiento s/n, 18100 Armilla (Granada), Spain. agil@ugr.es.
Maria D MesaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology II, Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology "Jose Mataix", University of Granada, Avenida del Conocimiento s/n, 18100 Armilla (Granada), Spain. mdmesa@ugr.es.
Universidad de Granada · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study was carried out to determine the glycemic index (GI), glycemic load (GL), insulinemic index (InI), appetite ratings and postprandial plasma concentrations of gastrointestinal hormones related to the control of food intake after the ingestion of the five most common breads consumed in Spain with different compositions and manufacturing processes. Twenty-two healthy adults participated in a randomized crossover study. The breads tested were Ordinary, Precooked-Frozen, Candeal-flour, Alfacar whites and Wholemeal. All breads portions were calculated to supply 50 g of available carbohydrates. In addition, 50 g of glucose was used as a reference. A linear mixed-effects model was used to compare data calculated for all breads with glucose load. The GI value varied from 61 for the Wholemeal, to Alfacar 68, Ordinary 76, and 78 and 86 for the Precooked-Frozen and Candeal-flour breads, respectively. Wholemeal and Alfacar had lower GI than glucose. All tested breads had a lower GL (ranged 9 to 18) compared with glucose. Wholemeal GL was similar to Alfacar, but lower than the other white breads. InI were significantly lower for all breads (ranged 68 to 73) compared with glucose, and similar among them. The intake of the Wholemeal bread led to a higher release of gastric inhibitory polypeptide compared with the Ordinary and Precooked breads and to a higher release of pancreatic polypeptide compared with the Precooked-Frozen bread. All breads affected appetite ratings similarly. In conclusion, based on GL, the Wholemeal bread would be expected to exert a favorable glycemic response.

Indexed as

AppetiteBreadGlycemic IndexGlycemic LoadAdultBlood GlucoseBody Mass IndexCross-Over StudiesDietary CarbohydratesDietary FatsDietary FiberDietary ProteinsEnergy IntakeFemaleFlourGastric Inhibitory PolypeptideBlood GlucoseDietary CarbohydratesDietary FatsDietary FiberDietary ProteinsGastric Inhibitory PolypeptideGastrointestinal HormonesInsulinappetite ratingsbreaddietary fibergastrointestinal hormonesglycemic indexglycemic loadinsulinogenic index

Identifiers

PMID26024293
PMCPMC4488771
OpenAlexW2154418161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.