ArticleNutrients2015
Development of a UK Online 24-h Dietary Assessment Tool: myfood24.
Article in Nutrients, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04758559 (Usability of myfood24 in Clinical Populations), which is not on this map. Cited by 103 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Usability of myfood24 in Clinical Populations
Who cites it
103 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review of reviews identifying UK validated dietary assessment tools for inclusion on an interactive guided website for researchers: www.nutritools.org.Critical reviews in food science and nutrition · 2020Pooled it
- Guideline
- Dietary assessment in minority ethnic groups: a systematic review of instruments for portion-size estimation in the United Kingdom.Nutrition reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Effect of gut microbiome modulation on muscle function and cognition: the PROMOTe randomised controlled trial.Nature communications · 2024Trial
- Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of the INDDEX24 Dietary Assessment Platform in Viet Nam.The British journal of nutrition · 2023Trial
- Usability of myfood24 Healthcare and Mathematical Diet Optimisation in Clinical Populations: A Pilot Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial.Nutrients · 2022Trial
- An exploratory investigation of the impact of 'fast' and 'feed' days during intermittent energy restriction on free-living energy balance behaviours and subjective states in women with overweight/obesity.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2021Trial
- User Experiences of a Smartphone-Based Attentive Eating App and Their Association With Diet and Weight Loss Outcomes: Thematic and Exploratory Analyses From a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Trial
- Reductions to main meal portion sizes reduce daily energy intake regardless of perceived normality of portion size: a 5 day cross-over laboratory experiment.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2020Trial
- A smartphone based attentive eating intervention for energy intake and weight loss: results from a randomised controlled trial.BMC public health · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Relative Validity of Food Frequency Questionnaires in Adult Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Food science & nutrition · 2026Review
- FoodScribe: an open-source semantic framework for nutrient estimation from free-text dietary records.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Closing the dietary fibre gap - developing a novel dietary fibre screening tool (SCREEN-IT) for the UK population: validity, reproducibility and usability insights.European journal of nutrition · 2026Article
- Urinary metabolites and fatigue in a population-based metabolomics study: an exploratory analysis.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026Article
- Design and usability of Abu Dhabi Food Intake24: a culturally adapted digital 24-hour dietary recall for the United Arab Emirates.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Accuracy, Usability, and User Perspectives of the Ecological Momentary Dietary Assessment App Traqq Among Dutch Adolescents: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Protocol of the validation of the experience sampling-based dietary assessment method (ESDAM) against doubly labeled water, urinary protein, and biomarkers.Nutrition journal · 2025Observational
- Developing a food list for a new 24-h dietary recall tool for New Zealand.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2025Article
- NutriDiary, a Smartphone-Based Dietary Record App: Description and Usability Evaluation.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Assessment of diet in large epidemiological studies can be costly and time consuming. An automated dietary assessment system could potentially reduce researcher burden by automatically coding food records. myfood24 (Measure Your Food on One Day) an online 24-h dietary assessment tool (with the flexibility to be used for multiple 24 h-dietary recalls or as a food diary), has been developed for use in the UK population. Development of myfood24 was a multi-stage process. Focus groups conducted with three age groups, adolescents (11-18 years) (n = 28), adults (19-64 years) (n = 24) and older adults (≥ 65 years) (n = 5) informed the development of the tool, and usability testing was conducted with beta (adolescents n = 14, adults n = 8, older adults n = 1) and live (adolescents n = 70, adults n = 20, older adults n = 4) versions. Median system usability scale (SUS) scores (measured on a scale of 0-100) in adolescents and adults were marginal for the beta version (adolescents median SUS = 66, interquartile range (IQR) = 20; adults median SUS = 68, IQR = 40) and good for the live version (adolescents median SUS = 73, IQR = 22; adults median SUS = 80, IQR = 25). Myfood24 is the first online 24-h dietary recall tool for use with different age groups in the UK. Usability testing indicates that myfood24 is suitable for use in UK adolescents and adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.