Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26024219›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Presence of MICA-DSA and Successful Renal Re-Transplant with Negative-MICA Virtual Crossmatch.

Yingzi Ming, Juan Hu, Qizhi Luo, Xiang Ding, Weiguang Luo, Quan Zhuang, Yizhou Zou

Open access · goldAbstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Leveraging NKG2D Ligands in Immuno-Oncology.Frontiers in immunology · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yingzi MingCenter for Organ Transplantation, the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Juan HuHLA Histocompatibility Laboratory, Department of Immunology, Xiangya School of Medicine, Center South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Qizhi LuoHLA Histocompatibility Laboratory, Department of Immunology, Xiangya School of Medicine, Center South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Xiang DingDepartment of Urology Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Center South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Weiguang LuoHLA Histocompatibility Laboratory, Department of Immunology, Xiangya School of Medicine, Center South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Quan ZhuangCenter for Organ Transplantation, the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yizhou ZouHLA Histocompatibility Laboratory, Department of Immunology, Xiangya School of Medicine, Center South University, Changsha, Hunan, China; The Cooperative Innovation Center of Engineering and New Products for Developmental Biology of Hunan Province, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Central South University · CNThird Xiangya Hospital · CNXiangya Hospital Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of donor-specific alloantibodies (DSAs) against the MICA antigen results in high risk for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) of a transplanted kidney, especially in patients receiving a re-transplant. We describe the incidence of acute C4d+ AMR in a patient who had received a first kidney transplant with a zero HLA antigen mismatch. Retrospective analysis of post-transplant T and B cell crossmatches were negative, but a high level of MICA alloantibody was detected in sera collected both before and after transplant. The DSA against the first allograft mismatched MICA*018 was in the recipient. Flow cytometry and cytotoxicity tests with five samples of freshly isolated human umbilical vein endothelial cells demonstrated the alloantibody nature of patient's MICA-DSA. Prior to the second transplant, a MICA virtual crossmatch and T and B cell crossmatches were used to identify a suitable donor. The patient received a second kidney transplant, and allograft was functioning well at one-year follow-up. Our study indicates that MICA virtual crossmatch is important in selection of a kidney donor if the recipient has been sensitized with MICA antigens.

Indexed as

Histocompatibility TestingKidney TransplantationAdultFemaleGraft RejectionHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHumansIsoantibodiesMaleMiddle AgedHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIsoantibodiesMHC class I-related chain A

Identifiers

PMID26024219
PMCPMC4449040
OpenAlexW1516045597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.