Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26023870›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2015

Marked seasonal variation in the wild mouse gut microbiota.

Corinne F Maurice, Sarah C L Knowles, Joshua Ladau, Katherine S Pollard, Andy Fenton, Amy B Pedersen, Peter J Turnbaugh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 200 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
200citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

200 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Phenological Changes in the Fecal Microbiota ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Characterization of the gut microbiome of wildFrontiers in microbiomes · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

140 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Corinne F MauriceFAS Center for Systems Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Sarah C L KnowlesCentre for Immunity, Infection and Evolution (CIIE), School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Joshua LadauGladstone Institutes, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Katherine S PollardGladstone Institutes, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Andy FentonInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Biosciences Building, Liverpool, UK.
Amy B PedersenCentre for Immunity, Infection and Evolution (CIIE), School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Peter J TurnbaughFAS Center for Systems Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF FUNCTIONAL MODULESP50GM068763 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI BENENSON, YAAKOV · 2003 to 2012
$28.9M
UCSF Nutrition Obesity Research CenterP30DK098722 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHRISTIAN VAISSE · 2015 to 2026
$14.6M
Intramural NIH HHSNIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK098722NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM068763Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 095831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have provided an unprecedented view of the microbial communities colonizing captive mice; yet the host and environmental factors that shape the rodent gut microbiota in their natural habitat remain largely unexplored. Here, we present results from a 2-year 16 S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing-based survey of wild wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) in two nearby woodlands. Similar to other mammals, wild mice were colonized by 10 bacterial phyla and dominated by the Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria. Within the Firmicutes, the Lactobacillus genus was most abundant. Putative bacterial pathogens were widespread and often abundant members of the wild mouse gut microbiota. Among a suite of extrinsic (environmental) and intrinsic (host-related) factors examined, seasonal changes dominated in driving qualitative and quantitative differences in the gut microbiota. In both years examined, we observed a strong seasonal shift in gut microbial community structure, potentially due to the transition from an insect- to a seed-based diet. This involved decreased levels of Lactobacillus, and increased levels of Alistipes (Bacteroidetes phylum) and Helicobacter. We also detected more subtle but statistically significant associations between the gut microbiota and biogeography, sex, reproductive status and co-colonization with enteric nematodes. These results suggest that environmental factors have a major role in shaping temporal variations in microbial community structure within natural populations.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeSeasonsAnimalsAnimals, WildBacteroidetesEcosystemFemaleIntestinesLactobacillusLinear ModelsMaleMicePhenotypeProteobacteriaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SUnited KingdomRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID26023870
PMCPMC4611506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.