Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2602383›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1989

Visualization of crystallin droplets associated with cold cataract formation in young intact rat lens.

W K Lo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1989. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Biomedical optics express · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Binary-liquid phase separation of lens protein solutions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1991
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

W K LoDepartment of Anatomy, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30310.
Morehouse School of Medicine · US

Funding

THE STUDY OF CELL JUNCTIONS IN THE OCULAR LENSR01EY005314 · NEI · MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LO, WOO-KUEN K · 1986 to 2019
$3.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01-EY05314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The structure, distribution, and nature of scattering elements associated with cold cataract formation in the young rat lens were studied in situ using light and electron microscopy and ImmunoGold electron microscopy. A large accumulation of spherical droplets, ranging from approximately 1.5 microns to 10 microns in diameter, were found in the lens nucleus in cold cataracts induced at 22 degrees C or 4 degrees C in TC-199 culture medium. Many droplets of all sizes were associated with the cell membranes. A cooled and then rewarmed lens was found to lose its opacity and subsequently no droplets were observed, indicating that there was a good correlation between the onset of opacification and the formation of droplets. Electron microscopy showed that droplets were composed of homogeneous electron-dense aggregates without limiting membranes. ImmunoGold study revealed that alpha-, beta-, and gamma-crystallins were all present within each droplet. This study demonstrates that extensive accumulation of the crystallin droplets in the lens nucleus is the contributing factor for the light scattering and opacification of the cold cataract in the young intact rat lens.

Indexed as

AnimalsCataractCold TemperatureCrystallinsImmunohistochemistryLens, CrystallineMicroscopy, ElectronOrgan Culture TechniquesRatsRats, Inbred StrainsCrystallins

Identifiers

PMID2602383
PMCPMC298615
OpenAlexW2081001485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.