Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26023783›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

Staff perception on biomedical or health care waste management: a qualitative study in a rural tertiary care hospital in India.

Sudhir Chandra Joshi, Vishal Diwan, Ashok J Tamhankar, Rita Joshi, Harshada Shah, Megha Sharma, Ashish Pathak, Ragini Macaden, Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  13. A Potential Way to Decrease the Know-Do Gap in Hospital Infection Control in Vietnam:International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sudhir Chandra JoshiDepartment of Community Medicine, R.D. Gardi Medical College, Ujjain, India.
Vishal DiwanDepartment of Public Health and Environment, R.D. Gardi Medical College, Ujjain, India; International Center for Health Research, R.D. Gardi Medical College, Ujjain, India; Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ashok J TamhankarDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Indian Initiative for Management of Antibiotic Resistance, Department of Environmental Medicine, R.D. Gardi Medical College, Ujjain, India.
Rita JoshiDepartment of Microbiology, R.D. Gardi Medical College, Ujjain, India.
Harshada ShahDepartment of Microbiology, R.D. Gardi Medical College, Ujjain, India.
Megha SharmaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Pharmacology, R.D. Gardi Medical College, Ujjain, India.
Ashish PathakDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Pediatrics, R.D. Gardi Medical College, Ujjain, India; Department of Women and Children's Health, International Maternal and Child Health Unit, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ragini MacadenSt. Johns Research Institute, Bangalore, India.
Cecilia Stålsby LundborgDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth care or biomedical waste, if not managed properly, can be of high risk to the hospital staff, the patients, the community, public health and the environment, especially in low and middle income settings where proper disposal norms are often not followed. Our aim was to explore perceptions of staff of an Indian rural tertiary care teaching hospital on hospital waste management.

methodA qualitative study was conducted using 10 focus group discussions (FGDs), with different professional groups, cleaning staff, nurses, medical students, doctors and administrators. The FGD guide included the following topics: (i) role of Health Care Waste Management (HCWM) in prevention of health care associated infections, (ii) awareness of and views about HCWM-related guidelines/legislation, (iii) current HCWM practices, (iv) perception and preparedness related to improvements of the current practices, and (v) proper implementation of the available guidelines/legislation. The FGDs were recorded, transcribed verbatim, translated to English (when conducted in Hindi) and analysed using content analysis.

resultsTwo themes were identified: Theme (A), 'Challenges in integration of HCWM in organizational practice,' with the categories (I) Awareness and views about HCWM, (II) Organizational practices regarding HCWM, and (III) Challenges in Implementation of HCWM; and Theme (B), 'Interventions to improve HCWM,' with three categories, (I) Educational and motivational interventions, (II) Organizational culture change, and (III) Policy-related interventions.

conclusionA gap between knowledge and actual practice regarding HCWM was highlighted in the perception of the hospital staff. The participants suggested organizational changes, training and monitoring to address this. The information generated is relevant not merely to the microsystem studied but to other institutions in similar settings.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelMedical WasteMedical Waste DisposalRural Health ServicesTertiary Care CentersAdultAgedFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedMedical WasteMedical Waste Disposal

Identifiers

PMID26023783
PMCPMC4449010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.