Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26022715›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2018

A Perspective on the Global Pandemic of Waterborne Disease.

Timothy E Ford, Steve Hamner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Exploring the Impact of Traditional Practices onInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Metagenomic Profiling of Microbial Pathogens in the Little Bighorn River, Montana.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Timothy E FordSchool of Health Professions, Shenandoah University, Winchester, VA, 22601, USA. tford@su.edu.
Steve HamnerDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, 59717, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Waterborne diseases continue to take a heavy toll on the global community, with developing nations, and particularly young children carrying most of the burden of morbidity and mortality. Starting with the historical context, this article explores some of the reasons why this burden continues today, despite our advances in public health over the past century or so. While molecular biology has revolutionized our abilities to define the ecosystems and etiologies of waterborne pathogens, control remains elusive. Lack of basic hygiene and sanitation, and failing infrastructure, remain two of the greatest challenges in the global fight against waterborne disease. Emerging risks continue to be the specter of multiple drug resistance and the ease with which determinants of virulence appear to be transmitted between strains of pathogens, both within and outside the human host.

Indexed as

Global HealthPandemicsBacterial InfectionsBiofilmsChildCholeraDeveloping CountriesDrug ResistanceDysenteryEscherichia coliHumansHygienePublic HealthRisk AssessmentSanitationVibrio choleraeBiofilmsE. coliHygieneInfrastructurePathogensSanitationSequencing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.