Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26022676›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2015

Recycling endosomes.

James R Goldenring

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. pH-dependent dissociation from CTLA-4 in early endosomes improves both safety and antitumor activity of anti-CTLA-4 antibodies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Discovery of a Small Molecule with an Inhibitory Role for RAB11.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

James R GoldenringDepartment of Surgery, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Cell & Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA; The Epithelial Biology Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA; The Nashville VA Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: jim.goldenring@vanderbilt.edu.

Funding

SMALL GTP BINDING PROTEINS IN GASTROINTESTINAL MUCOSAR01DK048370 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GOLDENRING, JAMES RICHARD · 1994 to 2025
$10.1M
Molecular characteristics of the apical recycling systemR01DK070856 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GOLDENRING, JAMES RICHARD · 2006 to 2014
$3.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK048370NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK070856NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK48370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The endosomal membrane recycling system represents a dynamic conduit for sorting and re-exporting internalized membrane constituents. The recycling system is composed of multiple tubulovesicular recycling pathways that likely confer distinct trafficking pathways for individual cargoes. In addition, elements of the recycling system are responsible for assembly and maintenance of apical membrane specializations including primary cilia and apical microvilli. The existence of multiple intersecting and diverging recycling tracks likely accounts for specificity in plasma membrane recycling trafficking.

Indexed as

Biological TransportCell MembraneCell PolarityEndocytosisEndosomesHumans

Identifiers

PMID26022676
PMCPMC4529760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.