ArticleClinical rheumatology2015
A cross-sectional study of autoantibody profiles in the Waikato systemic sclerosis cohort, New Zealand.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Autoantibody Profiles and Clinical Correlations in Systemic Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Study.EJIFCC · 2026Article
- Antibody Profile of Systemic Sclerosis and Mixed Connective Tissue Disease and Its Relationship with Lung Fibrosis and Pulmonary Hypertension.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- The Autoantibody Array Assay: A Novel Autoantibody Detection Method.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Diagnostic accuracy and predictive value of autoantibody profiles in patients with systemic sclerosis: a single-center study.Clinical rheumatology · 2023Article
- Autoantibodies associated with systemic sclerosis in three autoimmune diseases imprinted by type I interferon gene dysregulation: a comparison across SLE, primary Sjögren's syndrome and systemic sclerosis.Lupus science & medicine · 2022Article
- Scleromyositis: A distinct novel entity within the systemic sclerosis and autoimmune myositis spectrum. Implications for care and pathogenesis.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- The Ku complex: recent advances and emerging roles outside of non-homologous end-joining.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021Review
- Performance evaluation of a commercial line blot assay system for detection of myositis- and systemic sclerosis-related autoantibodies.Clinical rheumatology · 2020Article
- Innate Immunity in Systemic Sclerosis.Current rheumatology reports · 2017Review
- Single-specificity anti-Ku antibodies in an international cohort of 2140 systemic sclerosis subjects: clinical associations.Medicine · 2016Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The autoantibody profiles in New Zealand systemic sclerosis patients have not previously been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the autoantibody profiles of patients in the Waikato Hospital Systemic Sclerosis Clinic cohort. The EUROLINE (IgG) Systemic Sclerosis panel test kit (which tests for Scl-70, CENP-A, CENP-B, RP11, RP155, Fib, NOR90, Th/To, PM100, PM75, Ku, PDGFR and Ro-52) was selected for the purpose of this study. All patients attending the Waikato Hospital Systemic Sclerosis clinic were invited to participate. These patients were categorised by systemic sclerosis subtypes [1]. Results were compared with previously published data, including the EUSTAR database. Sixty patients (56 female) were recruited, with a median age of 61 years (range 29-81 years). Forty-one had limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis (lcSSc). Of these lcSSc patients, 31 (75.6%) were positive for CENP-A and CENP-B (anti-centromere) antibodies, 12 (29.3%) for Ro-52 antibodies, 5 (12.2%) for RP11 and RP155, 4 (9.8%) for Scl-70 and 1 (2.4%) each for anti-Fib and Th/To antibodies. Fifteen patients had diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc), of which 7 patients (47.6%) were positive for RP11 and RP155, 4 (26.7%) for Scl-70. Three dcSSc patients did not have either of these two major antibodies, but of these 15 dcSSc patients, 4 patients (26.7%) were positive also for Ro-52, 2 (13.3%) for anti-Ku, and 1 (6.7%) each for anti-Fib and NOR90. Four patients had overlap syndrome (OLS), 1 had CENP-A and CENP-B antibodies, 1 had Ro-52 autoantibodies 1 had anti-Ku antibodies. Three patients had no autoantibodies. This is the first study to look at the autoantibody profile of SSc patients in New Zealand. A higher prevalence of antibodies against centromere and RNA polymerase III was demonstrated in our group compared with the EUSTAR database suggesting that antibody prevalence may vary geographically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26022620What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.