Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26022573›Full record

ReviewVirus research2016

Single-cycle replicable Rift Valley fever virus mutants as safe vaccine candidates.

Kaori Terasaki, Breanna R Tercero, Shinji Makino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Virus research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kaori TerasakiDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-1019, USA. Electronic address: katerasa@utmb.edu.
Breanna R TerceroDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-1019, USA.
Shinji MakinoDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-1019, USA; Center for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-1019, USA; UTMB Center for Tropical Diseases, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-1019, USA; Sealy Center for Vaccine Development, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-1019, USA; Institute for Human Infections and Immunity, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-1019, USA.
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

Development of a Novel Rift Valley Fever Virus VaccineR21AI101772 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI MAKINO, SHINJI · 2013 to 2014
$425k
NIAID NIH HHS AI101772NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI101772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) is an arbovirus circulating between ruminants and mosquitoes to maintain its enzootic cycle. Humans are infected with RVFV through mosquito bites or direct contact with materials of infected animals. The virus causes Rift Valley fever (RVF), which was first recognized in the Great Rift Valley of Kenya in 1931. RVF is characterized by a febrile illness resulting in a high rate of abortions in ruminants and an acute febrile illness, followed by fatal hemorrhagic fever and encephalitis in humans. Initially, the virus was restricted to the eastern region of Africa, but the disease has now spread to southern and western Africa, as well as outside of the African continent, e.g., Madagascar, Saudi Arabia and Yemen. There is a serious concern that the virus may spread to other areas, such as North America and Europe. As vaccination is an effective tool to control RVFV epidemics, formalin-inactivated vaccines and live-attenuated RVFV vaccines have been used in endemic areas. The formalin-inactivated vaccines require boosters for effective protection, whereas the live-attenuated vaccines enable the induction of protective immunity by a single vaccination. However, the use of live-attenuated RVFV vaccines for large human populations having a varied health status is of concern, because of these vaccines' residual neuro-invasiveness and neurovirulence. Recently, novel vaccine candidates have been developed using replication-defective RVFV that can undergo only a single round of replication in infected cells. The single-cycle replicable RVFV does not cause systemic infection in immunized hosts, but enables the conferring of protective immunity. This review summarizes the properties of various RVFV vaccines and recent progress on the development of the single-cycle replicable RVFV vaccines.

Indexed as

Virus ReplicationAnimalsHumansRift Valley FeverRift Valley fever virusViral VaccinesViral VaccinesMembrane fusionRift Valley feverSafetySingle-cycle replicationVaccines

Identifiers

PMID26022573
PMCPMC4662630
OpenAlexW371950433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.