ArticleBMC ecology2015
A global perspective on decadal challenges and priorities in biodiversity informatics.
Article in BMC ecology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Amazonian amphibians: diversity, spatial distribution patterns, conservation and sampling deficits.Biodiversity data journal · 2024Article
- The colonial legacy of herbaria.Nature human behaviour · 2023Article
- Hyperspectral data as a biodiversity screening tool can differentiate among diverse Neotropical fishes.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Global and national trends, gaps, and opportunities in documenting and monitoring species distributions.PLoS biology · 2021Article
- Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review.PloS one · 2021Review
- Mapping Knowledge Gaps of Mozambique's Terrestrial Mammals.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- SISS-Geo: Leveraging Citizen Science to Monitor Wildlife Health Risks in Brazil.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2019Article
- To increase trust, change the social design behind aggregated biodiversity data.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018Article
- Taxonomic bias in biodiversity data and societal preferences.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Biodiversity analysis in the digital era.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biodiversity informatics is a field that is growing rapidly in data infrastructure, tools, and participation by researchers worldwide from diverse disciplines and with diverse, innovative approaches. A recent 'decadal view' of the field laid out a vision that was nonetheless restricted and constrained by its European focus. Our alternative decadal view is global, i.e., it sees the worldwide scope and importance of biodiversity informatics as addressing five major, global goals: (1) mobilize existing knowledge; (2) share this knowledge and the experience of its myriad deployments globally; (3) avoid 'siloing' and reinventing the tools of knowledge deployment; (4) tackle biodiversity informatics challenges at appropriate scales; and (5) seek solutions to difficult challenges that are strategic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.