Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26022240›Full record

ArticleGenetics2015

Visualizing Molecular Functions and Cross-Species Activity of Sex-Peptide in Drosophila.

Manabu Tsuda, Jean-Baptiste Peyre, Tsunaki Asano, Toshiro Aigaki

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Correlated Gene Copy Number Changes in a Seminal Fluid Protein Network inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Gene age shapes functional and evolutionary properties of theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Decoupled evolution of theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Decoupled evolution of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. The evolution of sex peptide: sexual conflict, cooperation, and coevolution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  13. ThePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manabu TsudaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan Department of Liberal Arts and Human Development, Kanagawa University of Human Services, Kanagawa 238-8522, Japan.
Jean-Baptiste PeyreDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan.
Tsunaki AsanoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan.
Toshiro AigakiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan aigaki-toshiro@tmu.ac.jp.
Tokyo Metropolitan University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Drosophila melanogaster sex-peptide (melSP) is a seminal fluid component that induces postmating responses (PMR) of females via the sex-peptide receptor (SPR) . Although SP orthologs are found in many Drosophila species, their functions remain poorly characterized. It is unknown whether SP functions are conserved across species or rather specific to each species. Here, we developed a GFP-tagged melSP (G-SP) and used it to visualize cross-species binding activity to the female reproductive system of various species. First we demonstrated that ectopically expressed G-SP induced PMR in D. melanogaster females and bound to the female reproductive system, most notably to the common oviduct. No binding occurred in the females lacking SPR, indicating that G-SP binding was dependent on SPR. Next we tested whether G-SP binds to the common oviducts from 11 Drosophila species using dissected reproductive tracts. The binding was observed in six species belonging to the D. melanogaster species group, but not to those outside the group. Injection of melSP reduced the receptivity of females belonging to the D. melanogaster species group, but not of those outside the group, being consistent with the ability to bind G-SP. Thus the SP-mediated PMR appears to be limited to this species group. SPR was expressed in the oviducts at high levels in this group; therefore, we speculate that an enhanced expression of SPR in the oviduct was critical to establish the SP-mediated PMR during evolution.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEvolution, MolecularFemaleMalePeptidesProtein BindingReceptors, PeptideReproductionSpecies SpecificitySpermatozoaDrosophila ProteinsPeptidesReceptors, Peptidesex peptide receptor, DrosophilaGFP-tagpostmating responsesex-peptideSP receptor

Identifiers

PMID26022240
PMCPMC4574256
OpenAlexW1909415493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.