Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26022217›Full record

ArticleChemical communications (Cambridge, England)2015

Linear synthesis and immunological properties of a fully synthetic vaccine candidate containing a sialylated MUC1 glycopeptide.

Pamela Thompson, Vani Lakshminarayanan, Nitin T Supekar, Judy M Bradley, Peter A Cohen, Margreet A Wolfert, Sandra J Gendler, Geert-Jan Boons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical communications (Cambridge, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Stereoselective Synthesis of Sialyl LewisAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Peptide Lipidation - A Synthetic Strategy to Afford Peptide Based Therapeutics.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2017
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pamela ThompsonComplex Carbohydrate Research Center, The University of Georgia, 315 Riverbend Road, Athens, GA 30602, USA. gjboons@ccrc.uga.edu.
Vani Lakshminarayanan
Nitin T Supekar
Judy M Bradley
Peter A Cohen
Margreet A Wolfert
Sandra J Gendler
Geert-Jan Boons

Funding

The Role of CHFR in Tumorigenesis and Paclitaxel-Sensitivity in Breast CancerP50CA116201 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PETER C LUCAS · 2005 to 2026
$49.9M
Tissue CoreP50CA102701 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PETERSEN, GLORIA M. · 2004 to 2018
$32.7M
Synthesis/Immunological Properties of Lewis AntigensR01CA088986 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA (UGA) · PI BOONS, GEERT-JAN · 2002 to 2015
$4.6M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA102701NCI NIH HHS P50CA102701NCI NIH HHS P50 CA116201NCI NIH HHS P50CA116201NCI NIH HHS R01 CA088986NCI NIH HHS R01CA88986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A strategy for the linear synthesis of a sialylated glycolipopeptide cancer vaccine candidate has been developed using a strategically designed sialyl-Tn building block and microwave-assisted solid-phase peptide synthesis. The glycolipopeptide elicited potent humoral and cellular immune responses. T-cells primed by such a vaccine candidate could be restimulated by tumor-associated MUC1.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsChemistry Techniques, SyntheticGlycopeptidesHumansMolecular Sequence DataMucin-1N-Acetylneuraminic AcidVaccines, SyntheticGlycopeptidesMucin-1N-Acetylneuraminic AcidVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID26022217
PMCPMC4486256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.