Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26022151›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie2015

Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in survival of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Di Zhou, Ming Ye, Yongrui Bai, Ling Rong, Yanli Hou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Analysis on survival and prognostic factors in patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Di ZhouThe Department of Radiation Oncology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ming YeThe Department of Radiation Oncology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yongrui BaiThe Department of Radiation Oncology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ling RongThe Department of Radiation Oncology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yanli HouThe Department of Radiation Oncology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe lymph node ratio (LNR) has been shown to be an important prognostic factor in patients with gastric, breast, pancreatic and colorectal cancer. We investigated the prognostic impact of the LNR in addition to TNM classification in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent curative resection for locally advanced rectal cancer between July 2005 and December 2010. We determined the LNR cutoff value using a receiver operating characteristic curve. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival curves, while Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between LNR and survival.

resultsWe included 180 patients aged 28-83 years with median follow-up of 41.8 months. The median number of lymph nodes examined and lymph nodes involved were 11.5 and 4, respectively, and the median LNR was 0.366. An LNR of 0.19 (19%) was the cutoff point to separate patients with regard to median overall survival. Median overall survival was 64.2 months for patients with an LNR of 0, 59.1 for an LNR of 0.19 or less and 37.6 for an LNR greater than 0.19 (p = 0.004). The median disease-free survival was 32.9 months for patients with an LNR of 0, 30.4 for an LNR of 0.19 or less and 17.8 for an LNR greater than 0.19 (p = 0.002).

conclusionOur results suggest that LNR should be considered an additional prognostic factor in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRectal Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID26022151
PMCPMC4512865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.