Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26021823›Full record

ReviewRespiratory research2015

Nanotechnology in respiratory medicine.

Albert Joachim Omlor, Juliane Nguyen, Robert Bals, Quoc Thai Dinh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Respiratory research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Treatment of lung diseasesMaterials today. Bio · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. A scientometrics study of the nanomedicines assisted in respiratory diseases.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Application of novel nanotechnologies in asthma.Annals of translational medicine · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Albert Joachim OmlorDepartment of Experimental Pneumology and Allergology, Saarland University Hospital and Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, Kirrberger Strasse, Geb. 61.4, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Juliane NguyenDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, SUNY Buffalo, New York, USA.
Robert BalsDepartment of Internal Medicine V, Pneumology, Allergology and Respiratory Critical Care Medicine, Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Quoc Thai DinhDepartment of Experimental Pneumology and Allergology, Saarland University Hospital and Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, Kirrberger Strasse, Geb. 61.4, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany. Thai.Dinh@uniklinikum-saarland.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Like two sides of the same coin, nanotechnology can be both boon and bane for respiratory medicine. Nanomaterials open new ways in diagnostics and treatment of lung diseases. Nanoparticle based drug delivery systems can help against diseases such as lung cancer, tuberculosis, and pulmonary fibrosis. Moreover, nanoparticles can be loaded with DNA and act as vectors for gene therapy in diseases like cystic fibrosis. Even lung diagnostics with computer tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) profits from new nanoparticle based contrast agents. However, the risks of nanotechnology also have to be taken into consideration as engineered nanomaterials resemble natural fine dusts and fibers, which are known to be harmful for the respiratory system in many cases. Recent studies have shown that nanoparticles in the respiratory tract can influence the immune system, can create oxidative stress and even cause genotoxicity. Another important aspect to assess the safety of nanotechnology based products is the absorption of nanoparticles. It was demonstrated that the amount of pulmonary nanoparticle uptake not only depends on physical and chemical nanoparticle characteristics but also on the health status of the organism. The huge diversity in nanotechnology could revolutionize medicine but makes safety assessment a challenging task.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsGene Transfer TechniquesHumansLung DiseasesNanofibersNanoparticlesNanotechnologyProtein Structure, SecondaryPulmonary MedicineRespiratory System AgentsRespiratory System Agents

Identifiers

PMID26021823
PMCPMC4456054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.