Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26021500›Full record

ArticleChinese medical journal2015

Clinical Control Study of Endoscopic Full-thickness Resection and Laparoscopic Surgery in the Treatment of Gastric Tumors Arising from the Muscularis Propria.

Cheng-Rong Wu, Liu-Ye Huang, Juan Guo, Bo Zhang, Jun Cui, Cheng-Ming Sun, Li-Xin Jiang, Zhi-Hua Wang, Ai-Hong Ju

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese medical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04751591 (Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicenter Clinical Trial For Comparison Of Safety Between Endoscopic Resection And Laparoscopic Partial Gastrectomy In Patients With 2-5cm Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04751591 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicenter Clinical Trial For Comparison Of Safety Between Endoscopic Resection And Laparoscopic Partial Gastrectomy In Patients With 2-5cm Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai Zhongshan HospitalRan2021 to 2024Enrolled260ConditionsGastric GISTArmsEndoscopic resection, Laparoscopic partial gastrectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Endoscopic full-thickness resectionWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Gastrointestinal exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection in the era of endoscopic suturing: a retrospective single-center case series.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cheng-Rong Wu
Liu-Ye HuangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Medical College of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong 264000, China.
Juan Guo
Bo Zhang
Jun Cui
Cheng-Ming Sun
Li-Xin Jiang
Zhi-Hua Wang
Ai-Hong Ju
Qingdao University · CNYuhuangding Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastric stromal tumors arising from the muscularis propria are located in deeper layers. Endoscopic resection may be contraindicated due to the possibility of perforation. These tumors are therefore usually removed by surgical or laparoscopic procedures. This study evaluated the curative effects, safety and feasibility of endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFR) of gastric stromal tumors originating from the muscularis propria.

methodsThis study enrolled 92 patients with gastric stromal tumors >2.5 cm originating from the muscularis propria. Fifty patients underwent EFR, and 42 underwent laparoscopic intragastric surgery. Operation time, complete resection rate, length of hospital stay, incidence of complications, and recurrence rates were compared in these two groups.

resultsEFR resulted in complete resection of all 50 gastric stromal tumors, with a mean procedure time of 85 ± 20 min, a mean hospitalization time of 7.0 ± 1.5 days and no complications. Laparoscopic intragastric surgery also resulted in a 100% complete resection rate, with a mean operation time of 88 ± 12 min and a mean hospitalization period of 7.5 ± 1.6 days. The two groups did not differ significantly in operation time, complete resection rates, hospital stay or incidence of complications (P > 0.05). No patient in either group experienced tumor recurrence.

conclusionsEFR technique is effective and safe for the resection of gastric stromal tumors arising from the muscularis propria.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleGastric MucosaHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26021500
PMCPMC4733781
OpenAlexW2269748373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.