Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26021449›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2015

Energy expenditure during common sitting and standing tasks: examining the 1.5 MET definition of sedentary behaviour.

Maedeh Mansoubi, Natalie Pearson, Stacy A Clemes, Stuart Jh Biddle, Danielle H Bodicoat, Keith Tolfrey, Charlotte L Edwardson, Thomas Yates

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  7. Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Sedentary behaviour and adiposity in youth: a systematic review of reviews and analysis of causality.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2017
    Pooled it
  10. Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Neighborhood walkability and sedentary behaviors among US adults.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maedeh MansoubiSchool of Sport, Exercise & Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK. M.Mansoubi@lboro.ac.uk.
Natalie PearsonSchool of Sport, Exercise & Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK. N.L.Pearson@lboro.ac.uk.
Stacy A ClemesSchool of Sport, Exercise & Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK. S.A.Clemes@lboro.ac.uk.
Stuart Jh BiddleInstitute of Sport, Exercise & Active Living, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia. stuart.biddle@vu.ed.au.
Danielle H BodicoatLeicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University of Leicester, Leicester, Leicestershire, UK. dhm6@leicester.ac.uk.
Keith TolfreySchool of Sport, Exercise & Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK. K.Tolfrey@lboro.ac.uk.
Charlotte L EdwardsonThe NIHR Leicester-Loughborough Diet, Lifestyle and Physical Activity Biomedical Research Unit, Leicester-Loughborough, Leicestershire, UK. ce95@leicester.ac.uk.
Thomas YatesThe NIHR Leicester-Loughborough Diet, Lifestyle and Physical Activity Biomedical Research Unit, Leicester-Loughborough, Leicestershire, UK. ty20@leicester.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSedentary behavior is defined as any waking behavior characterized by an energy expenditure of 1.5 METS or less while in a sitting or reclining posture. This study examines this definition by assessing the energy cost (METs) of common sitting, standing and walking tasks.

methodsFifty one adults spent 10 min during each activity in a variety of sitting tasks (watching TV, Playing on the Wii, Playing on the PlayStation Portable (PSP) and typing) and non-sedentary tasks (standing still, walking at 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, and 1.6 mph). Activities were completed on the same day in a random order following an assessment of resting metabolic rate (RMR). A portable gas analyzer was used to measure oxygen uptake, and data were converted to units of energy expenditure (METs).

resultsAverage of standardized MET values for screen-based sitting tasks were: 1.33 (SD: 0.24) METS (TV), 1.41 (SD: 0.28) (PSP), and 1.45 (SD: 0.32) (Typing). The more active, yet still seated, games on the Wii yielded an average of 2.06 (SD: 0.5) METS. Standing still yielded an average of 1.59 (SD: 0.37) METs. Walking MET values increased incrementally with speed from 2.17 to 2.99 (SD: 0.5 - 0.69) METs.

conclusionsThe suggested 1.5 MET threshold for sedentary behaviors seems reasonable however some sitting based activities may be classified as non-sedentary. The effect of this on the definition of sedentary behavior and associations with metabolic health needs further investigation.

Indexed as

Energy MetabolismSedentary BehaviorAdultBasal MetabolismCross-Over StudiesFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityPhysical ExaminationPlay and PlaythingsRecreationReference StandardsVideo Games

Identifiers

PMID26021449
PMCPMC4448542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.