Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26021312›Full record

ArticleInfection2015

Diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections using UMD-Universal Kit and the automated multiplex-PCR Unyvero i60 ITI(®) cartridge system: a pilot study.

Johannes P Borde, Georg A Häcker, Sina Guschl, Annerose Serr, Tobias Danner, Johannes Hübner, Sandra Burrack-Lange, Gerd Lüdke, Peter Helwig, Oliver Hauschild and 1 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. An evaluation of the Unyvero pneumonia system for rapid detection of microorganisms and resistance markers of lower respiratory infections-a multicenter prospective study on ICU patients.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Diagnostic Value of 16S Ribosomal RNA Gene Polymerase Chain Reaction/Sanger Sequencing in Clinical Practice.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  16. Ruling out underlying infection in 200 presumed aseptic knee and hip revision arthroplasties using a multiplex PCR system.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  17. Unyvero ITIMusculoskeletal surgery · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Johannes P BordeAbteilung Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Hugstetterstr. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. johannes.borde@web.de.
Georg A HäckerInstitut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Hygiene, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Hermann-Herder-Straße 11, 79104, Freiburg, Germany.
Sina GuschlAbteilung Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Hugstetterstr. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Annerose SerrInstitut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Hygiene, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Hermann-Herder-Straße 11, 79104, Freiburg, Germany.
Tobias DannerInstitut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Hygiene, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Hermann-Herder-Straße 11, 79104, Freiburg, Germany.
Johannes HübnerAbteilung für Pädiatrische Infektiologie, Kinderklinik und Kinderpoliklinik im Dr. von Haunerschen Kinderspital, Ludwig Maximilians Universität, 80337, Munich, Germany.
Sandra Burrack-LangeCuretis AG, Max-Eyth-Straße 42, 71088, Holzgerlingen, Germany.
Gerd LüdkeCuretis AG, Max-Eyth-Straße 42, 71088, Holzgerlingen, Germany.
Peter HelwigDepartment für Traumatologie, Sektion Endoprothetik, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Hugstetterstr. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Oliver HauschildDepartment für Traumatologie, Sektion Endoprothetik, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Hugstetterstr. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Winfried V KernAbteilung Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Hugstetterstr. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProsthetic joint infections (PJI) are associated with high morbidity and costs. Various efforts have been made to improve the diagnosis of PJI over the past years, but only few studies have assessed the diagnostic utility of nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) techniques in this context. Here, we report our experience with a commercial 16S rRNA gene PCR and an automated multiplex-PCR cartridge system in identifying pathogens causing PJI. MATERIALS AND

methodsA prospective single-centre study was performed including 54 patients with either septic or aseptic prosthetic joint replacement or surgical revision between February 2012 and April 2013. Conventional cultures of periprosthetic tissue samples were compared with the results of broad-range 16S rRNA gene real-time PCR (UMD-Universal Pathogen DNA Extraction and PCR Analysis, Molzym GmbH, Germany) and the multiplex-PCR Unyvero ITI(®) cartridge system (U-ITI; Curetis AG, Germany). Conventional culture and broad-range 16S rRNA gene real-time PCR were performed on all samples. U-ITI was used in a subgroup of 28 cases including all culture-positive cases. The agreement of the results from the methods was assessed.

resultsOf 54 cases, seven were culture-positive. Broad-range 16S rRNA gene real-time PCR gave 6, U-ITI 3 concordant positive results. Of the 47 culture-negative samples, 46 were also negative by broad-range 16S rRNA gene real-time PCR resulting in a 96 % (52/54) agreement between 16S rRNA gene PCR and culture. Of the 21 culture-negative samples analysed with U-ITI, 20 gave negative results, including the single 16S rRNA gene PCR-positive/culture-negative specimen. The rate of agreement between U-ITI and culture results was 82 % (23/28).

conclusionThis pilot study gave no indication of superiority of the used NAATs over conventional culture methods for the microbiological diagnosis of PJI. Drawbacks are susceptibility to contamination in the case of 16S rRNA gene real-time PCR, labour-intensive DNA extraction and limited pathogen panel in the case of the multiplex cartridge PCR system. More prospective trials are needed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of NAATs and their impact on the clinical management of PJI.

Indexed as

AgedAnimalsArthritis, InfectiousAutomation, LaboratoryBacteriological TechniquesDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalFemaleHumansMaleMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesProsthesis-Related InfectionsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA gene real-time PCROrthopaedic surgical carePCRProsthetic joint infection

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.