ArticlePloS one2015
Fossil and genetic evidence for the polyphyletic nature of the planktonic foraminifera "Globigerinoides", and description of the new genus Trilobatus.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 152 citations in OpenAlex.
- Two waves of photosymbiosis acquisition in extant planktonic foraminifera explained by ecological incumbency.The ISME journal · 2025Article
- Calcification and ecological depth preferences of the planktonic foraminiferRoyal Society open science · 2024Article
- Article
- Relationship between individual chamber and whole shell Mg/Ca ratios in Trilobatus sacculifer and implications for individual foraminifera palaeoceanographic reconstructions.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Ocean Carbon Storage across the middle Miocene: a new interpretation for the Monterey Event.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Integrated species-phenon trees: visualizing infraspecific diversity within lineages.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Controls on planktonic foraminifera apparent calcification depths for the northern equatorial Indian Ocean.PloS one · 2019Article
- Unassigned diversity of planktonic foraminifera from environmental sequencing revealed as known but neglected species.PloS one · 2019Article
- Future-proofing the Cenozoic macroperforate planktonic foraminifera phylogeny of Aze & others (2011).PloS one · 2018Article
- ForCenS, a curated database of planktonic foraminifera census counts in marine surface sediment samples.Scientific data · 2017Article
- Towards a morphological metric of assemblage dynamics in the fossil record: a test case using planktonic foraminifera.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016Article
- The impact of Cenozoic cooling on assemblage diversity in planktonic foraminifera.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016Article
- Extensive culturing experiment onJournal of plankton researchArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Planktonic foraminifera are one of the most abundant and diverse protists in the oceans. Their utility as paleo proxies requires rigorous taxonomy and comparison with living and genetically related counterparts. We merge genetic and fossil evidence of "Globigerinoides", characterized by supplementary apertures on spiral side, in a new approach to trace their "total evidence phylogeny" since their first appearance in the latest Paleogene. Combined fossil and molecular genetic data indicate that this genus, as traditionally understood, is polyphyletic. Both datasets indicate the existence of two distinct lineages that evolved independently. One group includes "Globigerinoides" trilobus and its descendants, the extant "Globigerinoides" sacculifer, Orbulina universa and Sphaeroidinella dehiscens. The second group includes the Globigerinoides ruber clade with the extant G. conglobatus and G. elongatus and ancestors. In molecular phylogenies, the trilobus group is not the sister taxon of the ruber group. The ruber group clusters consistently together with the modern Globoturborotalita rubescens as a sister taxon. The re-analysis of the fossil record indicates that the first "Globigerinoides" in the late Oligocene are ancestral to the trilobus group, whereas the ruber group first appeared at the base of the Miocene with representatives distinct from the trilobus group. Therefore, polyphyly of the genus "Globigerinoides" as currently defined can only be avoided either by broadening the genus concept to include G. rubescens and a large number of fossil species without supplementary apertures, or if the trilobus group is assigned to a separate genus. Since the former is not feasible due to the lack of a clear diagnosis for such a broad genus, we erect a new genus Trilobatus for the trilobus group (type species Globigerina triloba Reuss) and amend Globoturborotalita and Globigerinoides to clarify morphology and wall textures of these genera. In the new concept, Trilobatus n. gen. is paraphyletic and gave rise to the Praeorbulina/Orbulina and Sphaeroidinellopsis/Sphaeroidinella lineages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.