Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26020968›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Fossil and genetic evidence for the polyphyletic nature of the planktonic foraminifera "Globigerinoides", and description of the new genus Trilobatus.

Silvia Spezzaferri, Michal Kucera, Paul Nicholas Pearson, Bridget Susan Wade, Sacha Rappo, Christopher Robert Poole, Raphaël Morard, Claudio Stalder

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
17.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 152 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Towards a morphological metric of assemblage dynamics in the fossil record: a test case using planktonic foraminifera.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  13. The impact of Cenozoic cooling on assemblage diversity in planktonic foraminifera.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  14. Extensive culturing experiment onJournal of plankton research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Silvia SpezzaferriDepartment of Geosciences, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Michal KuceraCenter for Marine Environmental Sciences MARUM, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Paul Nicholas PearsonSchool of Earth & Ocean Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Bridget Susan WadeDepartment of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sacha RappoDepartment of Geosciences, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Christopher Robert PooleDepartment of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Raphaël MorardCenter for Marine Environmental Sciences MARUM, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Claudio StalderDepartment of Geosciences, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
University of Fribourg · CHUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Bremen · DECardiff University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Planktonic foraminifera are one of the most abundant and diverse protists in the oceans. Their utility as paleo proxies requires rigorous taxonomy and comparison with living and genetically related counterparts. We merge genetic and fossil evidence of "Globigerinoides", characterized by supplementary apertures on spiral side, in a new approach to trace their "total evidence phylogeny" since their first appearance in the latest Paleogene. Combined fossil and molecular genetic data indicate that this genus, as traditionally understood, is polyphyletic. Both datasets indicate the existence of two distinct lineages that evolved independently. One group includes "Globigerinoides" trilobus and its descendants, the extant "Globigerinoides" sacculifer, Orbulina universa and Sphaeroidinella dehiscens. The second group includes the Globigerinoides ruber clade with the extant G. conglobatus and G. elongatus and ancestors. In molecular phylogenies, the trilobus group is not the sister taxon of the ruber group. The ruber group clusters consistently together with the modern Globoturborotalita rubescens as a sister taxon. The re-analysis of the fossil record indicates that the first "Globigerinoides" in the late Oligocene are ancestral to the trilobus group, whereas the ruber group first appeared at the base of the Miocene with representatives distinct from the trilobus group. Therefore, polyphyly of the genus "Globigerinoides" as currently defined can only be avoided either by broadening the genus concept to include G. rubescens and a large number of fossil species without supplementary apertures, or if the trilobus group is assigned to a separate genus. Since the former is not feasible due to the lack of a clear diagnosis for such a broad genus, we erect a new genus Trilobatus for the trilobus group (type species Globigerina triloba Reuss) and amend Globoturborotalita and Globigerinoides to clarify morphology and wall textures of these genera. In the new concept, Trilobatus n. gen. is paraphyletic and gave rise to the Praeorbulina/Orbulina and Sphaeroidinellopsis/Sphaeroidinella lineages.

Indexed as

FossilsPhylogenyBiological EvolutionDNA, RibosomalForaminiferaOceans and SeasPlanktonSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID26020968
PMCPMC4447400
OpenAlexW2104910083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.