Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26020925›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Parallel changes in structural and functional measures of optic nerve myelination after optic neuritis.

Anneke van der Walt, Scott Kolbe, Peter Mitchell, Yejun Wang, Helmut Butzkueven, Gary Egan, Con Yiannikas, Stuart Graham, Trevor Kilpatrick, Alexander Klistorner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Visual Evoked Potentials for the Detection of Diabetic Retinal Neuropathy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anneke van der WaltCentre for Neuroscience, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Scott KolbeCentre for Neuroscience, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Peter MitchellDepartment of Radiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Yejun WangCentre for Neuroscience, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Helmut ButzkuevenDepartment of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Neurology, Box Hill Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Gary EganMonash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Con YiannikasDepartment of Neurology, Concord Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Stuart GrahamDepartment of Ophthalmology, Save Sight Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Australian School of Advanced Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Trevor KilpatrickCentre for Neuroscience, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Alexander KlistornerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Save Sight Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVisual evoked potential (VEP) latency prolongation and optic nerve lesion length after acute optic neuritis (ON) corresponds to the degree of demyelination, while subsequent recovery of latency may represent optic nerve remyelination. We aimed to investigate the relationship between multifocal VEP (mfVEP) latency and optic nerve lesion length after acute ON.

methodsThirty acute ON patients were studied at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months using mfVEP and at 1 and 12 months with optic nerve MRI. LogMAR and low contrast visual acuity were documented. By one month, the mfVEP amplitude had recovered sufficiently for latency to be measured in 23 (76.7%) patients with seven patients having no recordable mfVEP in more than 66% of segments in at least one test. Only data from these 23 patients was analysed further.

resultsBoth latency and lesion length showed significant recovery during the follow-up period. Lesion length and mfVEP latency were highly correlated at 1 (r = 0.94, p = <0.0001) and 12 months (r = 0.75, p < 0.001). Both measures demonstrated a similar trend of recovery. Speed of latency recovery was faster in the early follow-up period while lesion length shortening remained relatively constant. At 1 month, latency delay was worse by 1.76 ms for additional 1mm of lesion length while at 12 months, 1mm of lesion length accounted for 1.94 ms of latency delay.

conclusionA strong association between two putative measures of demyelination in early and chronic ON was found. Parallel recovery of both measures could reflect optic nerve remyelination.

Indexed as

AdultDemyelinating DiseasesEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOptic NerveOptic NeuritisVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID26020925
PMCPMC4447428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.