Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26020781›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Candidatus Frankia Datiscae Dg1, the Actinobacterial Microsymbiont of Datisca glomerata, Expresses the Canonical nod Genes nodABC in Symbiosis with Its Host Plant.

Tomas Persson, Kai Battenberg, Irina V Demina, Theoden Vigil-Stenman, Brian Vanden Heuvel, Petar Pujic, Marc T Facciotti, Elizabeth G Wilbanks, Anna O'Brien, Pascale Fournier and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
18.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Convergent evolution ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparative metagenomics of wild and cultivatedCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. MAGs-centric crack: how long will, spore-positiveFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Genomic Insights ofGenes · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. NADMicrobes and environments · 2023
    Article
  14. Draft Genomes ofJournal of genomics · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Proteogenome of SymbioticMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Draft Genomes of Nitrogen-fixingJournal of genomics · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Tomas PerssonDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Lilla Frescati, Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kai BattenbergDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California, 95616, United States of America.
Irina V DeminaDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Lilla Frescati, Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
Theoden Vigil-StenmanDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Lilla Frescati, Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
Brian Vanden HeuvelDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Pueblo, Colorado, 81001, United States of America.
Petar PujicUniversité Lyon 1, Université Lyon, CNRS, Ecologie Microbienne UMR5557, 69622, Villeurbanne Cedex, France.
Marc T FacciottiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis, California, 95616, United States of America; UC Davis Genome Center, University of California Davis, Davis, California, 95616, United States of America.
Elizabeth G WilbanksUC Davis Genome Center, University of California Davis, Davis, California, 95616, United States of America.
Anna O'BrienUC Davis Genome Center, University of California Davis, Davis, California, 95616, United States of America.
Pascale FournierUniversité Lyon 1, Université Lyon, CNRS, Ecologie Microbienne UMR5557, 69622, Villeurbanne Cedex, France.
Maria Antonia Cruz HernandezCentro de Biotecnología Genómica, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, 88710, Reynosa, Tamaulipas, Mexico.
Alberto Mendoza HerreraCentro de Biotecnología Genómica, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, 88710, Reynosa, Tamaulipas, Mexico.
Claudine MédigueGenoscope, Évry, France.
Philippe NormandUniversité Lyon 1, Université Lyon, CNRS, Ecologie Microbienne UMR5557, 69622, Villeurbanne Cedex, France.
Katharina PawlowskiDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Lilla Frescati, Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
Alison M BerryDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California, 95616, United States of America.
University of California, Davis · USStockholm University · SECentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstituto Politécnico Nacional · MXColorado State University Pueblo · USGenoscope · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frankia strains are nitrogen-fixing soil actinobacteria that can form root symbioses with actinorhizal plants. Phylogenetically, symbiotic frankiae can be divided into three clusters, and this division also corresponds to host specificity groups. The strains of cluster II which form symbioses with actinorhizal Rosales and Cucurbitales, thus displaying a broad host range, show suprisingly low genetic diversity and to date can not be cultured. The genome of the first representative of this cluster, Candidatus Frankia datiscae Dg1 (Dg1), a microsymbiont of Datisca glomerata, was recently sequenced. A phylogenetic analysis of 50 different housekeeping genes of Dg1 and three published Frankia genomes showed that cluster II is basal among the symbiotic Frankia clusters. Detailed analysis showed that nodules of D. glomerata, independent of the origin of the inoculum, contain several closely related cluster II Frankia operational taxonomic units. Actinorhizal plants and legumes both belong to the nitrogen-fixing plant clade, and bacterial signaling in both groups involves the common symbiotic pathway also used by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. However, so far, no molecules resembling rhizobial Nod factors could be isolated from Frankia cultures. Alone among Frankia genomes available to date, the genome of Dg1 contains the canonical nod genes nodA, nodB and nodC known from rhizobia, and these genes are arranged in two operons which are expressed in D. glomerata nodules. Furthermore, Frankia Dg1 nodC was able to partially complement a Rhizobium leguminosarum A34 nodC::Tn5 mutant. Phylogenetic analysis showed that Dg1 Nod proteins are positioned at the root of both α- and β-rhizobial NodABC proteins. NodA-like acyl transferases were found across the phylum Actinobacteria, but among Proteobacteria only in nodulators. Taken together, our evidence indicates an Actinobacterial origin of rhizobial Nod factors.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsFrankiaCucurbitaceaeGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenome, BacterialOperonPhylogenySymbiosisBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26020781
PMCPMC4447401
OpenAlexW2172231389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.