Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26020648›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Stemness of the hybrid Epithelial/Mesenchymal State in Breast Cancer and Its Association with Poor Survival.

Anne Grosse-Wilde, Aymeric Fouquier d'Hérouël, Ellie McIntosh, Gökhan Ertaylan, Alexander Skupin, Rolf E Kuestner, Antonio del Sol, Kathie-Anne Walters, Sui Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 239 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
239citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

239 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. How Do Cancer Cells Fuse and Why?Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. EMT and cancer: what clinicians should know.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025
    Review

179 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anne Grosse-WildeInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98109, United States of America.
Aymeric Fouquier d'HérouëlInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98109, United States of America; Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, L-4362 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Ellie McIntoshInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98109, United States of America.
Gökhan ErtaylanLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, L-4362 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Alexander SkupinInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98109, United States of America; Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, L-4362 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Rolf E KuestnerInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98109, United States of America.
Antonio del SolLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, L-4362 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Kathie-Anne WaltersInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98109, United States of America.
Sui HuangInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98109, United States of America.

Funding

Dynamics of Non-equalibrium Cell State Transitions in Cell PopulationsR01GM109964 · NIGMS · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI HUANG, SUI · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS 2P50GM075647NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer stem cells (CSCs) are thought to drive recurrence and metastasis. Their identity has been linked to the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) but remains highly controversial since--depending on the cell-line studied--either epithelial (E) or mesenchymal (M) markers, alone or together have been associated with stemness. Using distinct transcript expression signatures characterizing the three different E, M and hybrid E/M cell-types, our data support a novel model that links a mixed EM signature with stemness in 1) individual cells, 2) luminal and basal cell lines, 3) in vivo xenograft mouse models, and 4) in all breast cancer subtypes. In particular, we found that co-expression of E and M signatures was associated with poorest outcome in luminal and basal breast cancer patients as well as with enrichment for stem-like cells in both E and M breast cell-lines. This link between a mixed EM expression signature and stemness was explained by two findings: first, mixed cultures of E and M cells showed increased cooperation in mammosphere formation (indicative of stemness) compared to the more differentiated E and M cell-types. Second, single-cell qPCR analysis revealed that E and M genes could be co-expressed in the same cell. These hybrid E/M cells were generated by both E or M cells and had a combination of several stem-like traits since they displayed increased plasticity, self-renewal, mammosphere formation, and produced ALDH1+ progenies, while more differentiated M cells showed less plasticity and E cells showed less self-renewal. Thus, the hybrid E/M state reflecting stemness and its promotion by E-M cooperation offers a dual biological rationale for the robust association of the mixed EM signature with poor prognosis, independent of cellular origin. Together, our model explains previous paradoxical findings that breast CSCs appear to be M in luminal cell-lines but E in basal breast cancer cell-lines. Our results suggest that targeting E/M heterogeneity by eliminating hybrid E/M cells and cooperation between E and M cell-types could improve breast cancer patient survival independent of breast cancer-subtype.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEpithelial CellsMesenchymal Stem CellsNeoplastic Stem CellsAnimalsCell Line, TumorDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMiceMice, NudeNeoplasm TransplantationSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID26020648
PMCPMC4447403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.