Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26020590›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Characterization of the Escherichia coli σ(S) core regulon by Chromatin Immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq) analysis.

Clelia Peano, Johannes Wolf, Julien Demol, Elio Rossi, Luca Petiti, Gianluca De Bellis, Johannes Geiselmann, Thomas Egli, Stephan Lacour, Paolo Landini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. RpoS and the bacterial general stress response.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Mutations upstream fromJournal of bacteriology · 2024
    Article
  11. A negative feedback loop is critical for recovery of RpoS after stress inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Diversity inFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Review
  18. Spatial organization of RNA polymerase and its relationship with transcription inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Clelia PeanoInstitute of Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council (ITB-CNR), Segrate (MI), Italy.
Johannes WolfEAWAG, Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Julien DemolLab. Adaptation et Pathogénie des Micro-organismes (LAPM), Univ. Grenoble Alpes, F-38000 Grenoble, France.
Elio RossiDepartment of Biosciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Luca PetitiInstitute of Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council (ITB-CNR), Segrate (MI), Italy.
Gianluca De BellisInstitute of Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council (ITB-CNR), Segrate (MI), Italy.
Johannes GeiselmannLab. Adaptation et Pathogénie des Micro-organismes (LAPM), Univ. Grenoble Alpes, F-38000 Grenoble, France.
Thomas EgliEAWAG, Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Stephan LacourLab. Adaptation et Pathogénie des Micro-organismes (LAPM), Univ. Grenoble Alpes, F-38000 Grenoble, France.
Paolo LandiniDepartment of Biosciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology · CHUniversity of Milan · ITInstitute of Biomedical Technologies · ITNational Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine · USNational Research Council · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In bacteria, selective promoter recognition by RNA polymerase is achieved by its association with σ factors, accessory subunits able to direct RNA polymerase "core enzyme" (E) to different promoter sequences. Using Chromatin Immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq), we searched for promoters bound by the σ(S)-associated RNA polymerase form (Eσ(S)) during transition from exponential to stationary phase. We identified 63 binding sites for Eσ(S) overlapping known or putative promoters, often located upstream of genes (encoding either ORFs or non-coding RNAs) showing at least some degree of dependence on the σ(S)-encoding rpoS gene. Eσ(S) binding did not always correlate with an increase in transcription level, suggesting that, at some σ(S)-dependent promoters, Eσ(S) might remain poised in a pre-initiation state upon binding. A large fraction of Eσ(S)-binding sites corresponded to promoters recognized by RNA polymerase associated with σ(70) or other σ factors, suggesting a considerable overlap in promoter recognition between different forms of RNA polymerase. In particular, Eσ(S) appears to contribute significantly to transcription of genes encoding proteins involved in LPS biosynthesis and in cell surface composition. Finally, our results highlight a direct role of Eσ(S) in the regulation of non coding RNAs, such as OmrA/B, RyeA/B and SibC.

Indexed as

Transcription, GeneticBinding SitesChromatin ImmunoprecipitationEscherichia coliGene Expression Regulation, BacterialPromoter Regions, GeneticRNA, UntranslatedSigma FactorRNA, UntranslatedSigma Factor

Identifiers

PMID26020590
PMCPMC4447067
OpenAlexW2270249610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.