Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26019461›Full record

Observational studyWorld journal of gastroenterology2015

Novel immunological and nutritional-based prognostic index for gastric cancer.

Kai-Yu Sun, Jian-Bo Xu, Shu-Ling Chen, Yu-Jie Yuan, Hui Wu, Jian-Jun Peng, Chuang-Qi Chen, Pi Guo, Yuan-Tao Hao, Yu-Long He

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in World journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kai-Yu SunKai-Yu Sun, Jian-Bo Xu, Yu-Jie Yuan, Hui Wu, Jian-Jun Peng, Chuang-Qi Chen, Yu-Long He, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China.
Jian-Bo XuKai-Yu Sun, Jian-Bo Xu, Yu-Jie Yuan, Hui Wu, Jian-Jun Peng, Chuang-Qi Chen, Yu-Long He, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China.
Shu-Ling ChenKai-Yu Sun, Jian-Bo Xu, Yu-Jie Yuan, Hui Wu, Jian-Jun Peng, Chuang-Qi Chen, Yu-Long He, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China.
Yu-Jie YuanKai-Yu Sun, Jian-Bo Xu, Yu-Jie Yuan, Hui Wu, Jian-Jun Peng, Chuang-Qi Chen, Yu-Long He, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China.
Hui WuKai-Yu Sun, Jian-Bo Xu, Yu-Jie Yuan, Hui Wu, Jian-Jun Peng, Chuang-Qi Chen, Yu-Long He, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China.
Jian-Jun PengKai-Yu Sun, Jian-Bo Xu, Yu-Jie Yuan, Hui Wu, Jian-Jun Peng, Chuang-Qi Chen, Yu-Long He, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China.
Chuang-Qi ChenKai-Yu Sun, Jian-Bo Xu, Yu-Jie Yuan, Hui Wu, Jian-Jun Peng, Chuang-Qi Chen, Yu-Long He, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China.
Pi GuoKai-Yu Sun, Jian-Bo Xu, Yu-Jie Yuan, Hui Wu, Jian-Jun Peng, Chuang-Qi Chen, Yu-Long He, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China.
Yuan-Tao HaoKai-Yu Sun, Jian-Bo Xu, Yu-Jie Yuan, Hui Wu, Jian-Jun Peng, Chuang-Qi Chen, Yu-Long He, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China.
Yu-Long HeKai-Yu Sun, Jian-Bo Xu, Yu-Jie Yuan, Hui Wu, Jian-Jun Peng, Chuang-Qi Chen, Yu-Long He, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo assess the prognostic significance of immunological and nutritional-based indices, including the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-lymphocyte ratio in gastric cancer.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 632 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy between 1998 and 2008. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated to compare the predictive ability of the indices, together with estimating the sensitivity, specificity and agreement rate. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for overall survival (OS). Propensity score analysis was performed to adjust variables to control for selection bias.

resultsEach index could predict OS in gastric cancer patients in univariate analysis, but only PNI had independent prognostic significance in multivariate analysis before and after adjustment with propensity scoring (hazard ratio, 1.668; 95% confidence interval: 1.368-2.035). In subgroup analysis, a low PNI predicted a significantly shorter OS in patients with stage II-III disease (P = 0.019, P < 0.001), T3-T4 tumors (P < 0.001), or lymph node metastasis (P < 0.001). Canton score, a combination of PNI, NLR, and platelet, was a better indicator for OS than PNI, with the largest area under the curve for 12-, 36-, 60-mo OS and overall OS (P = 0.022, P = 0.030, P < 0.001, and P = 0.024, respectively). The maximum sensitivity, specificity, and agreement rate of Canton score for predicting prognosis were 84.6%, 34.9%, and 70.1%, respectively.

conclusionPNI is an independent prognostic factor for OS in gastric cancer. Canton score can be a novel preoperative prognostic index in gastric cancer.

Indexed as

Blood PlateletsGastrectomyNutritional StatusAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveChi-Square DistributionDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLength of StayLymphocyte CountLymphocytesMaleCanton scoreGastric cancerNeutrophil-lymphocyte ratioPlatelet-lymphocyte ratioPrognosisPrognostic nutritional index

Identifiers

PMID26019461
PMCPMC4438031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.