Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26019334›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin transporter genotype modulate performance monitoring functions but not their electrophysiological correlates.

Adrian G Fischer, Tanja Endrass, Martin Reuter, Christian Kubisch, Markus Ullsperger

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2018
    Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Adrian G FischerOtto-von-Guericke University, Institute of Psychology, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany, Max Planck Institute for Neurological Research, D-50866 Cologne, Germany, adrian.fischer@ovgu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8779-9051
Tanja EndrassOtto-von-Guericke University, Institute of Psychology, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8845-8803
Martin ReuterDepartment of Psychology, University of Bonn, D-53111 Bonn, Germany.
Christian KubischInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Ulm, D-89081 Ulm, Germany, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Institute of Human Genetics, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Markus UllspergerOtto-von-Guericke University, Institute of Psychology, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany, Max Planck Institute for Neurological Research, D-50866 Cologne, Germany, Radboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, 6525 Nijmegen, The Netherlands, and Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3970-1982
Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research · DEOtto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg · DERadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serotonin (5-HT) has been hypothesized to be implicated in performance monitoring by promoting behavioral inhibition in the face of aversive events. However, it is unclear whether this is restricted to external (punishment) or includes internal (response errors) events. The aim of the current study was to test whether higher 5-HT levels instigate inhibition specifically in the face of errors, measured as post-error slowing (PES), and whether this is represented in electrophysiological correlates of error processing, namely error-related negativity (ERN) and positivity. Therefore, from a large sample of human subjects (n = 878), two extreme groups were formed regarding hypothesized high and low 5-HT transporter (5-HTT) expression based on 5-HTTLPR and two additional single nucleotide polymorphisms (rs25531, rs25532). Seventeen higher (LL) and 15 lower (SS) expressing Caucasian subjects were administered the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) citalopram (10 mg) intravenously in a double-blind crossover design. We found pharmacogenetic evidence for a role of 5-HT in mediating PES: SSRI administration increased PES in both genetic groups, and SS subjects displayed higher PES. These effects were absent on post-conflict slowing. However, ERN and error positivity were unaffected by pharmacogenetic factors, but ERN was decoupled from behavioral adaptation by SSRI administration in the LL group. Thus, pharmacogenetic evidence suggests that increased 5-HT levels lead to behavioral inhibition in the context of internal aversive events, but electrophysiological correlates of performance monitoring appear unrelated to the 5-HT system. Therefore, our findings are consistent with theories suggesting that 5-HT mediates the link between aversive processing and inhibition.

Indexed as

GenotypeDouble-Blind MethodElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSerotonin Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsYoung AdultSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSerotonin Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsSLC6A4 protein, human5-HTTLPRcitalopramEEGperformance monitoringserotonin

Identifiers

PMID26019334
PMCPMC6605345
OpenAlexW1571936588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.