ArticleStem cells translational medicine2015
CD15 Expression Does Not Identify a Phenotypically or Genetically Distinct Glioblastoma Population.
Article in Stem cells translational medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tumor heterogeneity and resistance in glioblastoma: the role of stem cells.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2025Review
- Deciphering the role of transcription factors in glioblastoma cancer stem cells.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2024Review
- Understanding glioblastoma at the single-cell level: Recent advances and future challenges.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Glioma Stem Cells: Novel Data Obtained by Single-Cell Sequencing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Cancer cell heterogeneity and plasticity: A paradigm shift in glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology · 2022Review
- Phenotyping clonal populations of glioma stem cell reveals a high degree of plasticity in response to changes of microenvironment.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2022Article
- Opportunities and challenges of glioma organoids.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2021Review
- The adaptive transition of glioblastoma stem cells and its implications on treatments.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2021Review
- Cancer stem cells and macrophages: molecular connections and future perspectives against cancer.Oncotarget · 2021Review
- Glioma Stem-Like Cells and Metabolism: Potential for Novel Therapeutic Strategies.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Review
- Stem cell-associated heterogeneity in Glioblastoma results from intrinsic tumor plasticity shaped by the microenvironment.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells and Their Potential Application in Transplantation.Transplantation · 2018Review
- Article
- TGFβ-Responsive HMOX1 Expression Is Associated with Stemness and Invasion in Glioblastoma Multiforme.Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelled: Recent research has focused on the hypothesis that the growth and regeneration of glioblastoma (GB) is sustained by a subpopulation of self-renewing stem-like cells. This has led to the prediction that molecular markers for cancer stem cells in GB may provide a treatment target. One candidate marker is CD15: we wanted to determine if CD15 represented a credible stem cell marker in GB. We first demonstrated that CD15-positive (CD15+) cells were less proliferative than their CD15-negative (CD15-) counterparts in 10 patient GB tumors. Next we compared the proliferative activity of CD15+ and CD15- cells in vitro using tumor-initiating primary GB cell lines (TICs) and found no difference in proliferative behavior. Furthermore, TICs sorted for CD15+ and CD15- were not significantly different cytogenetically or in terms of gene expression profile. Sorted single CD15+ and CD15- cells were equally capable of reconstituting a heterogeneous population containing both CD15+ and CD15- cells over time, and both CD15+ and CD15- cells were able to generate tumors in vivo. No difference was found in the phenotypic or genomic behavior of CD15+ cells compared with CD15- cells from the same patient. Moreover, we found that in vitro, cells were able to interconvert between the CD15+ and CD15- states. Our data challenge the utility of CD15 as a cancer stem cell marker. SIGNIFICANCE: The data from this study contribute to the ongoing debate about the role of cancer stem cells in gliomagenesis. Results showed that CD15, a marker previously thought to be a cancer stem-like marker in glioblastoma, could not isolate a phenotypically or genetically distinct population. Moreover, isolated CD15-positive and -negative cells were able to generate mixed populations of glioblastoma cells in vitro.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.