Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26019165›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2015

As Clear as Mud? Determining the Diversity and Prevalence of Prophages in the Draft Genomes of Estuarine Isolates of Clostridium difficile.

Katherine R Hargreaves, James R Otieno, Anisha Thanki, Matthew J Blades, Andrew D Millard, Hilary P Browne, Trevor D Lawley, Martha R J Clokie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The Many Applications of Engineered Bacteriophages-An Overview.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Katherine R HargreavesDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Leicester, United Kingdom Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona.
James R OtienoDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Leicester, United Kingdom KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
Anisha ThankiDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Leicester, United Kingdom.
Matthew J BladesBioinformatics and Biostatistics Analysis Support Hub (BBASH), Core Biotechnology Services, University of Leicester, United Kingdom.
Andrew D MillardMicrobiology & Infection, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Hilary P BrowneMicrobial Pathogenesis Laboratory, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom.
Trevor D LawleyMicrobial Pathogenesis Laboratory, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom.
Martha R J ClokieDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Leicester, United Kingdom mrjc1@le.ac.uk.
University of Leicester · GBWellcome Sanger Institute · GBKenya Medical Research Institute · KEUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0700855Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 098051Wellcome Trust WT086418MAWellcome Trust WT100542AIA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bacterium Clostridium difficile is a significant cause of nosocomial infections worldwide. The pathogenic success of this organism can be attributed to its flexible genome which is characterized by the exchange of mobile genetic elements, and by ongoing genome evolution. Despite its pathogenic status, C. difficile can also be carried asymptomatically, and has been isolated from natural environments such as water and sediments where multiple strain types (ribotypes) are found in close proximity. These include ribotypes which are associated with disease, as well as those that are less commonly isolated from patients. Little is known about the genomic content of strains in such reservoirs in the natural environment. In this study, draft genomes have been generated for 13 C. difficile isolates from estuarine sediments including clinically relevant and environmental associated types. To identify the genetic diversity within this strain collection, whole-genome comparisons were performed using the assemblies. The strains are highly genetically diverse with regards to the C. difficile "mobilome," which includes transposons and prophage elements. We identified a novel transposon-like element in two R078 isolates. Multiple, related and unrelated, prophages were detected in isolates across ribotype groups, including two novel prophage elements and those related to the transducing phage φC2. The susceptibility of these isolates to lytic phage infection was tested using a panel of characterized phages found from the same locality. In conclusion, estuarine sediments are a source of genetically diverse C. difficile strains with a complex network of prophages, which could contribute to the emergence of new strains in clinics.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialBacterial ToxinsClostridioides difficileEnvironmental MicrobiologyEstuariesGenetic VariationGeologic SedimentsProphagesVirulenceBacterial ToxinsbacteriophageClostridium difficilemobilomepathogen genome evolutionprophagevirulence

Identifiers

PMID26019165
PMCPMC4524475
OpenAlexW2096509071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.