ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2015
Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with acute coronary syndrome with normal coronary arteries.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Infarct-like versus Non-Infarct-like Clinical Presentation of Acute Myocarditis: Comparison of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) Findings.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the prognosis of patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2021Article
- Risk factor comparison in young patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease vs. angiographically normal coronaries.International journal of medical sciences · 2021Article
- Acute Coronary Syndrome with Non-ruptured Plaques (NONRUPLA): Novel Ideas and Perspectives.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2020Review
- Determination of Myocardial Scar Tissue in Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenon and The Relationship Between Amount of Scar Tissue and Nt-ProBNP.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2020Article
- Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in the assessment of patients presenting with chest pain suspected for acute coronary syndrome.Annals of translational medicine · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate retrospectively the diagnostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) with normal coronary arteries, without pre-existing comorbidities. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the contrast-enhanced (CE) CMR images of 143 patients (70 males and 73 females, mean age 63 years, age range 37-87), within a server of 1590 patients, between January 2012 and January 2014. Only patients with ACS (anginal episode lasting at least 30 min) with normal coronary arteries were included, as well as patients with serologic assay of positive troponin I (TnI) and possible changes in ECG, particularly ST elevation. All patients with a history of ACS, or chronic troponin elevation, dyslipidemia, smoking, patients with cardiomyopathies or preexisting comorbidities such as diabetes, hereditary collagenopathies, amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, hemosiderosis or other infiltrative diseases were excluded to avoid possible bias.
resultsThe CMR LGE pattern attributable to AMI occurred in 40/143 cases (28 %) and in particular involved only a myocardial segment (60 %). The MR pattern of acute myocarditis occurred in 16/143 (11.2 %); in 6/143 cases, Tako-Tsubo cardiomyopathy was present. Eighty-one cases out of 143 presented a CMR with no LGE, parietal edema or morphological alterations (56.6 %).
conclusionIn patients with a first episode of ACS with normal coronary arteries, in the absence of pre-existing comorbidities, CMR has a high negative predictive value, often without significant alterations. In particular, the CMR LGE for AMI is infrequent and has predominantly focal distribution. However, further multidisciplinary studies are needed to define the prognostic value of CMR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.