ArticleThe oncologist2015
Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer in a Real-World Scenario: Is Progression-Free Survival With First Line Predictive of Benefit From Second and Later Lines?
Article in The oncologist, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05814224 (Monitoring luminAl Breast Cancer Through the Evaluation of Mutational and epiGeNEtic alteraTIons of Circulating ESR1 DNA), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Monitoring luminAl Breast Cancer Through the Evaluation of Mutational and epiGeNEtic alteraTIons of Circulating ESR1 DNA
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- 6th and 7th International consensus guidelines for the management of advanced breast cancer (ABC guidelines 6 and 7).Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2024Guideline
- A maintained absolute lymphocyte count predicts the overall survival benefit from eribulin therapy, including eribulin re-administration, in HER2-negative advanced breast cancer patients: a single-institutional experience.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2020Trial
- PARP inhibition with olaparib and talazoparib for HER2-negative advanced breast cancer-Results from the prospective PRAEGNANT registry.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- Combination Therapy, Drug Interactions, and Survival Outcomes in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Phase II Trials.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2026Article
- Cost and Cost-Effectiveness of Treating Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Low Metastatic Breast Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Article
- Relationship of Prior Anticancer Treatments with Palbociclib Clinical Outcomes in Patients with HRTargeted oncology · 2025Observational
- AZD8701, an Antisense Oligonucleotide Targeting FOXP3 mRNA, as Monotherapy and in Combination with Durvalumab: A Phase I Trial in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025Article
- Trifluridine-tipiracil in previously treated patients with oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (BOOG 2019-01 TIBET trial): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Attrition between lines of therapy and real-world outcomes of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in Europe: a cohort study leveraging electronic medical records.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Observational
- Effectiveness of first-line anticancer treatment may predict treatment response in further lines in stage III/IV patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Effect of prior treatments on post-CDK 4/6 inhibitor survival in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2023Article
- Objective Response to First-Line Treatment as a Predictor of Overall Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis from Two Centers over a 25-Year Period.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Real-life effectiveness of first-line anticancer treatments in stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients: Data from the Czech TULUNG Registry.Thoracic cancer · 2020Article
- APE1 and NPM1 protect cancer cells from platinum compounds cytotoxicity and their expression pattern has a prognostic value in TNBC.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2019Article
- Phase I study of local radiation and tremelimumab in patients with inoperable locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.Oncotarget · 2019Article
- Successfully treatment by eribulin in visceral crisis: a case of lymphangitic carcinomatosis from metastatic breast cancer.BMC cancer · 2018Article
- Surgery of the primary tumour in patients presenting with de novo metastatic breast cancer: to do or not to do?ESMO open · 2018Article
- Drug-screening and genomic analyses of HER2-positive breast cancer cell lines reveal predictors for treatment response.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2017Article
- The Changing Landscape of Breast Cancer: How Biology Drives Therapy.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Review
- Immunohistochemical prediction of lapatinib efficacy in advanced HER2-positive breast cancer patients.Oncotarget · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDespite the availability of several therapeutic options for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), no robust predictive factors are available to help clinical decision making. Nevertheless, a decreasing benefit from first line to subsequent lines of treatment is commonly observed. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of benefit from first-line therapy on outcome with subsequent lines.
methodsWe analyzed a consecutive series of 472 MBC patients treated with chemotherapy (CT) and/or endocrine therapy (ET) between 2004 and 2012. We evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) at first (PFS1), second, third, and fourth therapeutic lines, according to treatment (ET and/or CT) and tumor subtypes.
resultsIn the whole cohort, median overall survival was 34 months, and median PFS1 was 9 months. A 6-month benefit was shown by 289 patients (63.5%) at first line, 128 (40.5%) at second line, 76 (33.8%) at third line, and 34 (23.3%) at fourth line. Not having a 6-month benefit at PFS1 was associated with less chance of benefit at second line (odds ratio [OR]: 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29-0.77, p = .0026) and at any line beyond first (OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.24-0.62, p < .0001). In the total series, after stratification for tumor subtypes, a strong predictive effect was observed among HER2-positive tumors (OR: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.05-0.73, p = .0152).
conclusionOur results suggest that the absence of at least a 6-month benefit in terms of PFS with first-line therapy predicts a reduced probability of benefit from subsequent therapeutic lines, especially in HER2-positive disease. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study supports evidence showing that the absence of a 6-month benefit in terms of progression-free survival with first-line therapy predicts a lack of benefit from subsequent therapeutic lines in metastatic breast cancer. The random distribution of benefit experienced by a subset of the cohort further spurs an interest in identifying predictive factors capable of identifying the most appropriate therapeutic strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.