Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26018662›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2015

Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer in a Real-World Scenario: Is Progression-Free Survival With First Line Predictive of Benefit From Second and Later Lines?

Marta Bonotto, Lorenzo Gerratana, Donatella Iacono, Alessandro Marco Minisini, Karim Rihawi, Gianpiero Fasola, Fabio Puglisi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Study
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05814224 (Monitoring luminAl Breast Cancer Through the Evaluation of Mutational and epiGeNEtic alteraTIons of Circulating ESR1 DNA), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05814224 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Monitoring luminAl Breast Cancer Through the Evaluation of Mutational and epiGeNEtic alteraTIons of Circulating ESR1 DNA

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentro di Riferimento Oncologico - AvianoRan2018 to 2024Enrolled164ConditionsHormone Receptor Positive Breast Carcinoma, Breast Neoplasms, Neoplasms, Breast, Breast DiseasesArmsLiquid biopsy and CT scan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cost and Cost-Effectiveness of Treating Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Low Metastatic Breast Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marta BonottoDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy; Department of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Lorenzo GerratanaDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy; Department of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Donatella IaconoDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy; Department of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Alessandro Marco MinisiniDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy; Department of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Karim RihawiDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy; Department of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Gianpiero FasolaDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy; Department of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Fabio PuglisiDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy; Department of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy fabio.puglisi@uniud.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite the availability of several therapeutic options for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), no robust predictive factors are available to help clinical decision making. Nevertheless, a decreasing benefit from first line to subsequent lines of treatment is commonly observed. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of benefit from first-line therapy on outcome with subsequent lines.

methodsWe analyzed a consecutive series of 472 MBC patients treated with chemotherapy (CT) and/or endocrine therapy (ET) between 2004 and 2012. We evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) at first (PFS1), second, third, and fourth therapeutic lines, according to treatment (ET and/or CT) and tumor subtypes.

resultsIn the whole cohort, median overall survival was 34 months, and median PFS1 was 9 months. A 6-month benefit was shown by 289 patients (63.5%) at first line, 128 (40.5%) at second line, 76 (33.8%) at third line, and 34 (23.3%) at fourth line. Not having a 6-month benefit at PFS1 was associated with less chance of benefit at second line (odds ratio [OR]: 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29-0.77, p = .0026) and at any line beyond first (OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.24-0.62, p < .0001). In the total series, after stratification for tumor subtypes, a strong predictive effect was observed among HER2-positive tumors (OR: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.05-0.73, p = .0152).

conclusionOur results suggest that the absence of at least a 6-month benefit in terms of PFS with first-line therapy predicts a reduced probability of benefit from subsequent therapeutic lines, especially in HER2-positive disease. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study supports evidence showing that the absence of a 6-month benefit in terms of progression-free survival with first-line therapy predicts a lack of benefit from subsequent therapeutic lines in metastatic breast cancer. The random distribution of benefit experienced by a subset of the cohort further spurs an interest in identifying predictive factors capable of identifying the most appropriate therapeutic strategy.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMiddle AgedTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsBreast neoplasmsDecision makingOverall survivalTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID26018662
PMCPMC4492241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.