Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26018417›Full record

ReviewBMC nephrology2015

Streptococcus uberis and Staphylococcus aureus forefoot and blood stream co-infection in a haemodialysis patient: a case report.

Christine Valentiny, Harald Dirschmid, Karl Lhotta

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC nephrology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Open forum infectious diseases · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christine ValentinyDepartment of Nephrology and Dialysis, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Carinagasse 47, A-6800, Feldkirch, Austria. Christine.valentiny@vlkh.net.
Harald DirschmidInstitute for Pathology, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria. harald.dirschmid@lkhf.at.
Karl LhottaDepartment of Nephrology and Dialysis, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Carinagasse 47, A-6800, Feldkirch, Austria. Karl.lhotta@lkhf.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStreptococcus uberis, the most frequent cause of mastitis in lactating cows, is considered non-pathogenic for humans. Only a few case reports have described human infections with this microorganism, which is notoriously difficult to identify. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 75-year-old male haemodialysis patient, who developed a severe foot infection with osteomyelitis and bacteraemia. Both Streptococcus uberis and Staphylococcus aureus were identified in wound secretion and blood samples using mass spectrometry. The presence of Streptococcus uberis was confirmed by superoxide dismutase A sequencing. The patient recovered after amputation of the forefoot and antibiotic treatment with ampicillin/sulbactam. He had probably acquired the infection while walking barefoot on cattle pasture land.

conclusionThis is the first case report of a human infection with Streptococcus uberis with identification of the microorganism using modern molecular technology. We propose that Staphylococcus aureus co-infection was a prerequisite for deep wound and bloodstream infection with Streptococcus uberis.

Indexed as

AgedAmputation, SurgicalAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaBlood-Borne PathogensCoinfectionCombined Modality TherapyFollow-Up StudiesFoot DiseasesHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleOsteomyelitisRare DiseasesRenal DialysisRisk AssessmentAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID26018417
PMCPMC4446856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.