Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26018176›Full record

ArticleHealth care management science2016

The effect of information technology on hospital performance.

Cynthia Williams, Yara Asi, Amanda Raffenaud, Matt Bagwell, Ibrahim Zeini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health care management science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Implementation of Computerized Prescriber Order Entry Systems: A Review of Impacts, Barriers, and Facilitators.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Ensuring electronic medical record simulation through better training, modeling, and evaluation.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Religious Hospitals and Poorer Health Outcomes: A Case Study Using Hospital Performance Ratings.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cynthia WilliamsDepartment of Public Health, Brooks College of Health, University of North Florida, 1 UNF Drive, Jacksonville, FL, 32224-2646, USA. Cynthia.white-williams@unf.edu.
Yara AsiCollege of Health & Public Affairs, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Fl, USA.
Amanda RaffenaudCollege of Health & Public Affairs, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Fl, USA.
Matt BagwellCollege of Health & Public Affairs, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Fl, USA.
Ibrahim ZeiniCollege of Health & Public Affairs, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Fl, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While healthcare entities have integrated various forms of health information technology (HIT) into their systems due to claims of increased quality and decreased costs, as well as various incentives, there is little available information about which applications of HIT are actually the most beneficial and efficient. In this study, we aim to assist administrators in understanding the characteristics of top performing hospitals. We utilized data from the Health Information and Management Systems Society and the Center for Medicare and Medicaid to assess 1039 hospitals. Inputs considered were full time equivalents, hospital size, and technology inputs. Technology inputs included personal health records (PHR), electronic medical records (EMRs), computerized physician order entry systems (CPOEs), and electronic access to diagnostic results. Output variables were measures of quality, hospital readmission and mortality rate. The analysis was conducted in a two-stage methodology: Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Automatic Interaction Detector Analysis (AID), decision tree regression (DTreg). Overall, we found that electronic access to diagnostic results systems was the most influential technological characteristics; however organizational characteristics were more important than technological inputs. Hospitals that had the highest levels of quality indicated no excess in the use of technology input, averaging one use of a technology component. This study indicates that prudent consideration of organizational characteristics and technology is needed before investing in innovative programs.

Indexed as

Efficiency, OrganizationalHospital AdministrationDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresElectronic Health RecordsHealth PolicyHealth Services ResearchHospital Bed CapacityHumansInformation SystemsMedical Order Entry SystemsPatient Access to RecordsPatient ReadmissionPatient SatisfactionPerceptionPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingQuality of Health CareAIDDEAEfficiencyHealth information technologyHospitalQuality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.