Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26018127›Full record

Trial reportBMC family practice2015

"Keeping Moving": factors associated with sedentary behaviour among older people recruited to an exercise promotion trial in general practice.

Ruth Heseltine, Dawn A Skelton, Denise Kendrick, Richard W Morris, Mark Griffin, Deborah Haworth, Tahir Masud, Steve Iliffe

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC family practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Objective assessment of the association between frailty and sedentary behavior in older adults: a cross-sectional study.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ruth HeseltineDepartment of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill St., London, NW3 2PF, UK. ruth_heseltine@hotmail.com.
Dawn A SkeltonSchool of Health & Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Rd, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, G4 0BA, UK. dawn.skelton@gcu.ac.uk.
Denise KendrickDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Floor 13, Tower Building, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. denise.kendrick@nottingham.ac.uk.
Richard W MorrisSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK. richard.morris@bristol.ac.uk.
Mark GriffinDepartment of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill St., London, NW3 2PF, UK. m.griffin@ucl.ac.uk.
Deborah HaworthDepartment of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill St., London, NW3 2PF, UK. d.haworth@ucl.ac.uk.
Tahir MasudNottingham University Hospital NHS Trust, Derby Rd, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. tash.masud@nottingham.ac.uk.
Steve IliffeDepartment of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill St., London, NW3 2PF, UK. s.iliffe@ucl.ac.uk.
Glasgow Caledonian University · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Department of Health 06/36/04Medical Research Council MR/K00414X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSedentary behaviour is detrimental to health, even in those who achieve recommended levels of physical activity. Efforts to increase physical activity in older people so that they reach beneficial levels have been disappointing. Reducing sedentary behaviour may improve health and be less demanding of older people, but it is not clear how to achieve this. We explored the characteristics of sedentary older people enrolled into an exercise promotion trial to gain insights about those who were sedentary but wanted to increase activity.

methodParticipants in the ProAct65+ trial (2009-2013) were categorised as sedentary or not using a self-report questionnaire. Demographic data, health status, self-rated function and physical test performance were examined for each group. 1104 participants aged 65 & over were included in the secondary analysis of trial data from older people recruited via general practice. Results were analysed using logistic regression with stepwise backward elimination.

resultsThree hundred eighty seven (35 %) of the study sample were characterised as sedentary. The likelihood of being categorised as sedentary increased with an abnormal BMI (<18.5 or >25 g/m(2)) (Odds Ratio 1.740, CI 1.248-2.425), ever smoking (OR 1.420, CI 1.042-1.934) and with every additional medication prescribed (OR 1.069, CI 1.016-1.124). Participants reporting better self-rated physical health (SF-12) were less likely to be sedentary; (OR 0.961, 0.936-0.987). Participants' sedentary behaviour was not associated with gender, age, income, education, falls, functional fitness, quality of life or number of co-morbidities.

conclusionSome sedentary older adults will respond positively to an invitation to join an exercise study. Those who did so in this study had poor self-rated health, abnormal BMI, a history of smoking, and multiple medication use, and are therefore likely to benefit from an exercise intervention.

trial registrationISRCTN reference: ISRCTN43453770.

Indexed as

Motor ActivityPsychomotor PerformanceSedentary BehaviorAgedFamily PracticeFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionHealth Status DisparitiesHumansMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CarePolypharmacyStatistics as Topic

Identifiers

PMID26018127
PMCPMC4446807
OpenAlexW1880500810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.