Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26018048›Full record

Trial reportImplementation science : IS2015

A cluster randomized Hybrid Type III trial testing an implementation support strategy to facilitate the use of an evidence-based practice in VA homeless programs.

David A Smelson, Matthew Chinman, Sharon McCarthy, Gordon Hannah, Leon Sawh, Mark Glickman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01430741 (MISSION-Vet HUD-VASH Implementation Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01430741 nacompletednot on this map

MISSION-Vet HUD-VASH Implementation Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2012 to 2016Enrolled227ConditionsSubstance Related Disorders, Mental IllnessArmsMaintaining Independence and Sobriety Through Systems Integration, Outreach, and Networking (Veterans Edition), Getting To Outcomes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David A SmelsonVA National Center on Homelessness Among Veterans, Bedford, MA, USA. David.Smelson@umassmed.edu.
Matthew ChinmanVA National Center on Homelessness Among Veterans, Bedford, MA, USA. Chinman@rand.org.
Sharon McCarthyVA National Center on Homelessness Among Veterans, Bedford, MA, USA. Sharon.McCarthy@va.gov.
Gordon HannahVA National Center on Homelessness Among Veterans, Bedford, MA, USA. Gordon.Hannah@va.gov.
Leon SawhVA National Center on Homelessness Among Veterans, Bedford, MA, USA. Leon.Sawh@va.gov.
Mark GlickmanVA Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford, MA, USA. mg@bu.edu.

Funding

HSRD VA SDP 11-240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Housing and Urban Development-Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (HUD-VASH) program is one of the largest initiatives to end Veteran homelessness. However, mental health and substance use disorders continue to reduce client stability and impede program success. HUD-VASH programs do not consistently employ evidence-based practices that address co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders. This paper presents a study protocol to evaluate the implementation of an evidence-based, co-occurring disorder treatment called Maintaining Independence and Sobriety Through Systems Integration, Outreach, and Networking-Veterans Edition (MISSION-Vet) in HUD-VASH using an implementation strategy called Getting To Outcomes (GTO). METHODS/

designIn three large VA Medical Centers, this Hybrid Type III trial will randomize case managers and their clients by HUD-VASH sub-teams to receive either MISSION-Vet Implementation as Usual (IU-standard training and access to the MISSION-Vet treatment manuals) or MISSION-Vet implementation augmented by GTO. In addition to testing GTO, effectiveness of the treatment (MISSION-Vet) will be assessed using existing Veteran-level data from the HUD-VASH data monitoring system. This project will compare GTO and IU case managers and their clients on the following variables: (1) fidelity to the MISSION-Vet intervention; (2) proportion of time the Veteran is housed; (3) mental health, substance use, and functional outcomes among Veterans; and (4) factors key to the successful deployment of a new treatment as specified by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) model. DISCUSSION: This project is an important step for developing an implementation strategy to increase adoption of evidence-based practice use in VA homeless programs, and to further examine efficacy of MISSION-Vet in HUD-VASH. This project has important implications for program managers, policy makers, and researchers within the homelessness field. VA Central IRB approval for this study was granted in October 2011. The three sites were trained on MISSION-Vet and GTO in the first half of 2013. The first GTO planning meetings began after training occurred, between January 2013 and November 2013, across the three sites. The data collection-via a fidelity measure embedded into the VA Computerized Patient Record System-began as each site initiated MISSION-Vet, between April 2013 and January 2014.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01430741.

Indexed as

HousingIll-Housed PersonsMental HealthCase ManagementEvidence-Based PracticeHumansMental Health ServicesResearch DesignSubstance-Related DisordersUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs

Identifiers

PMID26018048
PMCPMC4448312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.