Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26017796›Full record

ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2015

Teleaudiometry as a screening method in school children.

Maine Botasso, Seisse Gabriela Gandolfi Sanches, Ricardo Ferreira Bento, Alessandra Giannella Samelli

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Tele-Audiology: Current State and Future Directions.Frontiers in digital health · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Results of hearing screening of school-age children in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.Primary health care research & development · 2020
    Article
  10. The potential of eHealth in otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery: patients' perspectives.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maine BotassoDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Seisse Gabriela Gandolfi SanchesDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ricardo Ferreira BentoDepartment of Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Alessandra Giannella SamelliDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the efficacy and feasibility of teleaudiometry with that of sweep audiometry in elementary school children, using pure-tone audiometry as the gold standard.

methodsA total of 243 students with a mean age of 8.3 years participated in the study. Of these, 118 were boys, and 125 were girls. The following procedures were performed: teleaudiometry screening with software that evaluates hearing at frequencies of 1,000, 2000 and 4000 Hz at 25 dBHL; sweep audiometry screening in an acoustic booth (20 dBHL at the same frequencies); pure-tone audiometry thresholds in an acoustic booth (frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz); and acoustic immittance measurements.

resultsThe diagnostic capacities of the teleaudiometry/sweep audiometry screening methods were as follows: sensitivity  ϝ  58%/65%; specificity  ϝ  86%/99%; positive predictive value  ϝ  51%/91%; negative predictive value  ϝ  89%/92%; and accuracy  ϝ  81%/92%. Teleaudiometry and sweep audiometry showed moderate agreement. Furthermore, the use of these methods in series with immittance testing improved the specificity, whereas parallel testing improved the sensitivity.

conclusionTeleaudiometry was found to be reliable and feasible for screening hearing in school children. Moreover, teleaudiometry is the preferred method for remote areas where specialized personnel and specific equipment are not available, and its use may reduce the costs of hearing screening programs.

Indexed as

AdolescentAudiometryAudiometry, Pure-ToneAuditory ThresholdChildFeasibility StudiesFemaleHearing LossHumansMaleMass ScreeningReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySoftwareTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID26017796
PMCPMC4418376
OpenAlexW372389906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.