Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26017737›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2016

Feasibility of mesorectal vascular invasion in predicting early distant metastasis in patients with stage T3 rectal cancer based on rectal MRI.

Young Chul Kim, Jai Keun Kim, Myeong-Jin Kim, Jei Hee Lee, Young Bae Kim, Sung Jae Shin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The prognostic value of extramural venous invasion in preoperative MRI of rectal cancer patients.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Young Chul KimDepartment of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164, World Cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 443-380, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Jai Keun KimDepartment of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164, World Cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 443-380, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea. kimjk@ajou.ac.kr.
Myeong-Jin KimDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Institute of Gastroenterology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University Health system, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jei Hee LeeDepartment of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164, World Cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 443-380, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Young Bae KimDepartment of Pathology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Sung Jae ShinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the feasibility of mesorectal vascular invasion (MVI) in predicting early distant metastasis developed within 1 year of diagnosis of T3 rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

methodsSixty-five patients with T3 rectal cancer (early metastasis, n = 28; non-metastasis, n = 37) were enrolled in this study. Early distant metastases developed in 28 patients (liver, n = 15; lung, n = 9; both, n = 4). Logistic regression was used to determine the independent predictors for early distant metastasis.

resultsIn univariate analysis, tumour location, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), MRI-detected MVI, and mesorectal fat infiltration (MFI) (odds ratio [OR], 4.533, 9.583, 5.539, 27.046, and 5.539, respectively) were associated with early distant metastasis. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that MVI (OR, 29.949; P < 0.002) and LVI (OR, 6.684; P = 0.033) were independent factors for early distant metastasis. Specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of MVI (94.59%, and 89.47%, respectively) were significantly higher than those of LVI (64.86%, and 61.76%), but sensitivity and negative predictive value were not significantly different between MVI (60.71%, and 76.09%) and LVI (75.00%, and 77.42%).

conclusionsWhile sensitivity of MRI-detected MVI was equal to that of CEA in predicting early distant metastasis from T3 rectal cancer, specificity and PPV may be improved by assessing MVI. KEY POINTS: • Mesorectal vascular invasion (MVI) may be a radiologic prognostic factor for rectal cancer. • Specificity of MVI was higher than lymphovascular invasion in predicting early metastasis. • Mesorectal vascular invasion may be a better predictor for early distant metastasis.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymphatic VesselsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRectal NeoplasmsDistant metastasisLymphovascular invasionMagnetic resonance imagingMesorectal vascular invasionRectal cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.