Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26017707›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2015

Recent neuroimaging advances in the study of primary headaches.

Amy R Tso, Peter J Goadsby

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Imaging the migrainous brain: the present and the future.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2019
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amy R TsoDepartment of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA, amy.tso@ucsfmedctr.org.
Peter J Goadsby

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroimaging techniques can be used to investigate both functional and structural features of the brain in patients who have primary headache disorders such as migraine or cluster headache. Improved treatments are needed for both, and this goal will likely be facilitated by a better understanding of the underlying biology. Functional imaging studies have identified regions active during attacks, as well as abnormalities that are present during the interictal period. Volumetric, surface-based morphometric, and tractography studies have revealed structural changes, although whether these represent a cause or effect of the condition remains to be determined. The development of new techniques and modalities promises to yield additional insights in the future. This article aims to review the major findings and most recent advances in neuroimaging of migraine and cluster headache.

Indexed as

Functional NeuroimagingBrainGray MatterHeadache Disorders, PrimaryHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingWhite Matter

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.