ArticleBMC health services research2015
Successful collaboration in dementia care from the perspectives of healthcare professionals and informal carers in Germany: results from a focus group study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Barriers for access and utilization of dementia care services in Europe: a systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Needs, resources, and barriers among family caregivers of people with dementia: a qualitative study.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2026Article
- Tips for multidisciplinary pain management in advanced dementia based on expert opinions.Journal of rural medicine : JRM · 2025Article
- Unveiling the qualities of a 'good doctor': family carers' and healthcare professionals' perspective on dementia healthcare in India.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- The Special Care Unit for People with Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (SCU- B) in the Context of the Project "RECage-Respectful Caring for Agitated Elderly": A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Interprofessional collaboration in palliative dementia care through the eyes of informal caregivers.Dementia (London, England) · 2022Article
- The use of formal care for dementia from a professional perspective: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Professional Care Networks of Frail Older People: An Explorative Survey Study from the Patient Perspective.International journal of integrated care · 2020Article
- Mirror meetings with frail older people and multidisciplinary primary care teams: Process and impact analysis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019Article
- Applying a new concept of embedding qualitative research: an example from a quantitative study of carers of people in later stage dementia.BMC geriatrics · 2019Observational
- Factors Influencing Emergency Care by Persons With Dementia: Stakeholder Perceptions and Unmet Needs.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2019Article
- Perspectives of policy and political decision makers on access to formal dementia care: expert interviews in eight European countries.BMC health services research · 2017Article
- Dementia care management in primary care : Current collaborative care models and the case for interprofessional education.Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2017Review
- Evaluation of a Complex Implementation to Shape, Spread, Scale, and Sustain a New Dementia Care Resource for Better, More Integrated Care.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInformal carers of persons with dementia are in contact with numerous healthcare professionals (HCP) in a complex healthcare system. Successful collaboration between the parties involved appears to be essential for good dementia care. Thus, we investigated the perceptions of both HCP and informal carers regarding successful collaboration and sought to describe obstacles and facilitators.
methodsAs part of the 7(th) framework EU project RightTimePlaceCare, five focus groups were conducted with HCP and informal carers of persons with dementia in Germany (n = 30 participants/ time: Oct/Nov 2011). A supplementary secondary data analysis was performed, applying qualitative content analysis with open coding.
resultsThe derived categories were sorted into three overarching themes: collaboration between HCP and informal carers, collaboration among HCP and the impact of resources and healthcare system. HCP and informal carers largely agree on what facilitates or impedes successful collaboration between them. Making the initial contact appears to be a major challenge. While HCP expect to be contacted, informal carers hesitate to seek assistance, primarily due to inner barriers. Permanent contact person/institution, well-trained, empathetic HCP who can establish a trustful relationship are regarded as facilitating collaboration. The relational perspective is more clearly emphasised by HCP than by informal carers. This may be attributed to the absence of a permanent contact person in Germany. Sufficient information relay, clear responsibilities, motivation and defined aims, and a personal relationship between professionals are mentioned as facilitators. External factors, such as rapid staff turnover, insufficient time resources and conditions specified by the health and long-term care system causing financial competition between providers, are described as general barriers to successful collaboration.
conclusionsHCP and informal carers had comparable perceptions of successful collaboration among them. The initial contact seems to be particularly challenging. Better strategies are urgently needed to facilitate the access to professional support. A permanent contact person (e.g., a case manager) might improve collaboration among all the parties involved, but this is not available regularly. Constraints created by the healthcare system may considerably hinder successful collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.