Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26017658›Full record

Trial reportJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2015

Estimating the Cost of Early Infant Male Circumcision in Zimbabwe: Results From a Randomized Noninferiority Trial of AccuCirc Device Versus Mogen Clamp.

Collin Mangenah, Webster Mavhu, Karin Hatzold, Andrea K Biddle, Ngonidzashe Madidi, Getrude Ncube, Owen Mugurungi, Ismail Ticklay, Frances M Cowan, Harsha Thirumurthy

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Collin Mangenah*Centre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Research (CeSHHAR), Harare, Zimbabwe; †University College London, London, United Kingdom; ‡Population Services International, Harare, Zimbabwe; §University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; ‖Ministry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe; and ¶University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Webster Mavhu
Karin Hatzold
Andrea K Biddle
Ngonidzashe Madidi
Getrude Ncube
Owen Mugurungi
Ismail Ticklay
Frances M Cowan
Harsha Thirumurthy
Centre for Sexual Health and HIV AIDS Research · ZWMinistry of Health and Child Welfare · ZWUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSafe and cost-effective programs for implementing early infant male circumcision (EIMC) in Africa need to be piloted. We present results on a relative cost analysis within a randomized noninferiority trial of EIMC comparing the AccuCirc device with Mogen clamp in Zimbabwe.

methodsBetween January and June 2013, male infants who met inclusion criteria were randomized to EIMC through either AccuCirc or Mogen clamp conducted by a doctor, using a 2:1 allocation ratio. We evaluated the overall unit cost plus the key cost drivers of EIMC using both AccuCirc and Mogen clamp. Direct costs included consumable and nonconsumable supplies, device, personnel, associated staff training, and environmental costs. Indirect costs comprised capital and support personnel costs. In 1-way sensitivity analyses, we assessed potential changes in unit costs due to variations in main parameters, one at a time, holding all other values constant.

resultsThe unit costs of EIMC using AccuCirc and Mogen clamp were $49.53 and $55.93, respectively. Key cost drivers were consumable supplies, capacity utilization, personnel costs, and device price. Unit prices are likely to be lowest at full capacity utilization and increase as capacity utilization decreases. Unit prices also fall with lower personnel salaries and increase with higher device prices.

conclusionsEIMC has a lower unit cost when using AccuCirc compared with Mogen clamp. To minimize unit costs, countries planning to scale-up EIMC using AccuCirc need to control costs of consumables and personnel. There is also need to negotiate a reasonable device price and maximize capacity utilization.

Indexed as

Circumcision, MaleCosts and Cost AnalysisHealth PersonnelHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInservice TrainingMaleSurgical InstrumentsTime FactorsZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID26017658
PMCPMC4508205
OpenAlexW390694099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.