Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26017560›Full record

Observational studyCurrent Alzheimer research2015

Functional Activities Questionnaire Items that Best Discriminate and Predict Progression from Clinically Normal to Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Gad A Marshall, Amy S Zoller, Natacha Lorius, Rebecca E Amariglio, Joseph J Locascio, Keith A Johnson, Reisa A Sperling, Dorene M Rentz

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Current Alzheimer research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Turns and downturns in aging drivers.Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gad A MarshallCenter for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 221 Longwood Avenue, BL-104H, Boston, MA 02115, USA. gamarshall@partners.org.
Amy S Zoller
Natacha Lorius
Rebecca E Amariglio
Joseph J Locascio
Keith A Johnson
Reisa A Sperling
Dorene M Rentz

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
Vascular factors, physical activity, and inflammation as modulators of neurodegenerative and cognitive trajectories (Project 2)P01AG036694 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Rachel Frances Buckley, Keith A. Johnson · 2010 to 2026
$50.2M
THE ROLE OF ADVANCED CAA IN ALZHEIMER'S DEMENTIAP50AG005134 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HYMAN, BRADLEY T. · 1985 to 2018
$42.1M
Research Education ComponentP30AG062421 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Christine S Ritchie · 2019 to 2026
$36.5M
Evolution of memory-related fMRI activation over the course of MCI and ADR01AG027435 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI JOHNSON, KEITH A., SPERLING, REISA A. · 2006 to 2016
$8.6M
Mentoring Imaging Research in Early ADK24AG035007 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SPERLING, REISA A. · 2010 to 2020
$1.4M
PIB binding, hypometabolism, apathy and executive dysfunction in MCI and ADK23AG033634 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MARSHALL, GAD ASHER · 2009 to 2013
$727k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG033634NIA NIH HHS K24 AG035007NIA NIH HHS K24AG035007NIA NIH HHS P01 AG036694NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062421NIA NIH HHS P50 AG005134NIA NIH HHS P50AG005134NIA NIH HHS R01 AG027435NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904PHS HHS P01AGO36694
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImpairment in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) emerges in the transition from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia. Some IADL scales are sensitive to early deficits in MCI, but none have been validated for detecting subtle functional changes in clinically normal (CN) elderly at risk for AD.

methodsData from 624 subjects participating in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative and 524 subjects participating in the Massachusetts Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, which are two large cohorts including CN elderly and MCI subjects, were used to determine which Functional Activities Questionnaire items best discriminate between and predict progression from CN to MCI.

resultsWe found that "Remembering appointments" and "assembling tax records" best discriminated between CN and MCI subjects, while worse performance on "paying attention and understanding a TV program", "paying bills/balancing checkbook", and "heating water and turning off the stove" predicted greater hazard of progressing from a diagnosis of CN to MCI.

conclusionsThese results demonstrate that certain questions are especially sensitive in detecting the earliest functional changes in CN elderly at risk for AD. As the field moves toward earlier intervention in preclinical AD, it is important to determine which IADL changes can be detected at that stage and track decline over time.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingSurveys and QuestionnairesAgedCognitive DysfunctionCross-Sectional StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleNeuropsychological TestsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID26017560
PMCPMC4448081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.