Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26017535›Full record

Trial reportNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2015

Early (≤ 1-h) vs. late (>1-h) administration of frovatriptan plus dexketoprofen combination vs. frovatriptan monotherapy in the acute treatment of migraine attacks with or without aura: a post hoc analysis of a double-blind, randomized, parallel group study.

Gianni Allais, Gennaro Bussone, Vincenzo Tullo, Pietro Cortelli, Fabio Valguarnera, Piero Barbanti, Giuliano Sette, Fabio Frediani, Giacomo D'Arrigo, Florindo d'Onofrio and 5 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advances in clinical neurology through the journal "Neurological Sciences" (2015-2016).Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2017
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Gianni AllaisDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Women's Headache Center, University of Turin, Via Ventimiglia 3, 10126, Turin, Italy, gb.allais@tiscali.it.
Gennaro Bussone
Vincenzo Tullo
Pietro Cortelli
Fabio Valguarnera
Piero Barbanti
Giuliano Sette
Fabio Frediani
Giacomo D'Arrigo
Florindo d'Onofrio
Giancarlo Comi
Marcella Curone
Bruno Colombo
Stefano Omboni
Chiara Benedetto
Casa di Cura Columbus · ITOspedale San Carlo · ITUniversity of Turin · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITAzienda Ospedaliera S.Giuseppe Moscati · ITCTO Andrea Alesini · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · ITIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San RaffaeleItalian Institute of Telemedicine · ITUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The early use of triptan in combination with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug after headache onset may improve the efficacy of acute migraine treatment. In this retrospective analysis of a randomized, double-blind, parallel group study, we assessed the efficacy of early or late intake of frovatriptan 2.5 mg + dexketoprofen 25 or 37.5 mg (FroDex 25 and FroDex 37.5) vs. frovatriptan 2.5 mg alone (Frova) in the acute treatment of migraine attacks. In this double-blind, randomized parallel group study 314 subjects with acute migraine with or without aura were randomly assigned to Frova, FroDex 25, or FroDex 37.5. Pain free (PF) at 2-h (primary endpoint), PF at 4-h and pain relief (PR) at 2 and 4-h, speed of onset at 60, 90, 120 and 240-min, and sustained pain free (SPF) at 24-h were compared across study groups according to early (≤1-h; n = 220) or late (>1-h; n = 59) intake. PF rates at 2 and 4-h were significantly larger with FroDex 37.5 vs. Frova (early intake, n = 71 FroDex 37.5 and n = 75 Frova: 49 vs. 32 % and 68 vs. 52 %, p < 0.05; late intake, n = 20 Frodex 37.5, and n = 18 Frova: 55 vs. 17 %, p < 0.05 and 85 vs. 28 %, p < 0.01). Also with FroDex 25, in the early intake group (n = 74) PF episodes were significantly higher than Frova. PR at 2 and 4-h was significantly better under FroDex 37.5 than Frova (95 % vs. 50 %, p < 0.001, 100 % vs. 72 %, p < 0.05) in the late intake group (n = 21). SPF episodes at 24-h after early dosing were 25 % (Frova), 45 % (FroDex 25) and 41 % (FroDex 37.5, p < 0.05 combinations vs. monotherapy), whereas they were not significantly different with late intake. All treatments were equally well tolerated. FroDex was similarly effective regardless of intake timing from headache onset.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCarbazolesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKetoprofenMaleMigraine DisordersPain MeasurementSerotonin Receptor AgonistsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeTromethamineAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCarbazolesdexketoprofen trometamolfrovatriptanKetoprofenSerotonin Receptor AgonistsTromethamineTryptamines

Identifiers

PMID26017535
OpenAlexW1555004242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.