Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26017447›Full record

ReviewNature2015

From evolutionary computation to the evolution of things.

Agoston E Eiben, Jim Smith

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evolvable AI: Threats of a new major transition in evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Bioengineering hybrid artificial life.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Heliyon · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Robots as models of evolving systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Editorial: Evolving Robotic Morphologies.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Real-World Robot Evolution: Why Would it (not) Work?Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021
    Review
  20. Robot Evolution: Ethical Concerns.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Agoston E EibenVU University Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1081a, 1081HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jim SmithUniversity of the West of England, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolution has provided a source of inspiration for algorithm designers since the birth of computers. The resulting field, evolutionary computation, has been successful in solving engineering tasks ranging in outlook from the molecular to the astronomical. Today, the field is entering a new phase as evolutionary algorithms that take place in hardware are developed, opening up new avenues towards autonomous machines that can adapt to their environment. We discuss how evolutionary computation compares with natural evolution and what its benefits are relative to other computing approaches, and we introduce the emerging area of artificial evolution in physical systems.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiological EvolutionBiomimeticsComputersAdaptation, PhysiologicalAutomationGenotypeMathematicsModels, TheoreticalProblem SolvingRobotics

Identifiers

PMID26017447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.