Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26017368›Full record

ArticlePrehospital emergency care2016

Prehospital Trauma Triage Decision-making: A Model of What Happens between the 9-1-1 Call and the Hospital.

Courtney Marie Cora Jones, Jeremy T Cushman, E Brooke Lerner, Susan G Fisher, Christopher L Seplaki, Peter J Veazie, Erin B Wasserman, Ann Dozier, Manish N Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prehospital emergency care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Clinical reasoning in the emergency medical services: an integrative review.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Assessing and Addressing Model Trustworthiness Trade-offs in Trauma Triage.International journal of artificial intelligence tools : architectures, languages, algorithms · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Trauma-team-activation in Germany: how do emergency service professionals use the activation due to trauma mechanism? Results from a nationwide survey.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  18. Factors Associated with School Nurses' Triage Competency in South Korea.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Courtney Marie Cora Jones
Jeremy T Cushman
E Brooke Lerner
Susan G Fisher
Christopher L Seplaki
Peter J Veazie
Erin B Wasserman
Ann Dozier
Manish N Shah

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER'S RESEARCH ASSOCIATE ORGANIZATIONUL1RR024160 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI PEARSON, THOMAS ARTHUR · 2006 to 2011
$38.7M
Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain InjuryU01NS086090 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DIAZ-ARRASTIA, RAMON, GIACINO, JOSEPH THOMAS · 2013 to 2017
$19.1M
Field Triage of Older Adults Who Experience Traumatic Brain InjuryU01CE002175 · CE · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI SHAH, MANISH N · 2012 to 2014
$749k
NCIPC CDC HHS U01 CE002175NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024160NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS086090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe the decision-making process used by emergency medical services (EMS) providers in order to understand how 1) injured patients are evaluated in the prehospital setting; 2) field triage criteria are applied in-practice; and 3) selection of a destination hospital is determined. We conducted separate focus groups with advanced and basic life support providers from rural and urban/suburban regions. Four exploratory focus groups were conducted to identify overarching themes and five additional confirmatory focus groups were conducted to verify initial focus group findings and provide additional detail regarding trauma triage decision-making and application of field triage criteria. All focus groups were conducted by a public health researcher with formal training in qualitative research. A standardized question guide was used to facilitate discussion at all focus groups. All focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed. Responses were coded and categorized into larger domains to describe how EMS providers approach trauma triage and apply the Field Triage Decision Scheme. We conducted 9 focus groups with 50 EMS providers. Participants highlighted that trauma triage is complex and there is often limited time to make destination decisions. Four overarching domains were identified within the context of trauma triage decision-making: 1) initial assessment; 2) importance of speed versus accuracy; 3) usability of current field triage criteria; and 4) consideration of patient and emergency care system-level factors. Field triage is a complex decision-making process which involves consideration of many patient and system-level factors. The decision model presented in this study suggests that EMS providers place significant emphasis on speed of decisions, relying on initial impressions and immediately observable information, rather than precise measurement of vital signs or systematic application of field triage criteria.

Indexed as

Decision MakingEmergency Medical TechniciansTriageAdultEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew YorkQualitative ResearchTransportation of PatientsWounds and Injuriesemergency medical servicesmedical decision-makingtriage

Identifiers

PMID26017368
PMCPMC5125413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.