ArticleClinical rheumatology2015
Rhupus; unusual presentations.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rhupus syndrome: a unique disease overlapping systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Article
- Examining the clinical and radiological landscape of rhupus: navigating the challenges in disease classification.Rheumatology international · 2024Review
- A Rare Case of Rhupus Syndrome With Systemic Involvement: A Case Report and Literature Review.Cureus · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe coexistence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) named Rhupus is an unusual clinical condition. Previous reports mentioned that Rhupus patients have prominent RA-associated clinical manifestations and only mild organic damage related to SLE. Progressive or life-threatening manifestations are rare in Rhupus patients.
methodsThree patients with Rhupus are described in this article. Two of them presented antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in addition to Rhupus. Also, we searched for similar cases in published literature.
resultsWe present three patients with Rhupus syndrome. One of the patients has only Rhupus, the second patient has Rhupus and APS, and the third patient has Rhupus accompanied by severe Raynaud's syndrome with digital ulcers, APS, pulmonary hypertension and two malignancies. Several studies have shown that Rhupus patients have an increased prevalence of positive antiphospholipid antibodies that resembles SLE. However, the presence of these antibodies is not associated with APS. There is only one case of Rhupus with secondary APS in which the patient presented headache and papilloedema due to cerebral venous thrombosis. Secondary Raynaud's syndrome is rare in Rhupus patients, and to the best of our knowledge, only three cases of this are mentioned in literature. Secondary pulmonary hypertension and malignancies were never reported before in Rhupus patients.
conclusionsRheumatologists should be aware of the possibility that Rhupus may be accompanied by progressive or life-threatening conditions such as APS, severe Raynaud's syndrome with digital ulcers, pulmonary hypertension, or malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.